2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0739-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography

Abstract: DBT and US gave better detection rates and diagnostic accuracy for non-calcified DCIS compared with DM in all cases and in dense breasts. The detection rate of DBT was lower than that of US in all cases and in dense breasts. The diagnostic accuracy of DBT was slightly higher than that of US in all cases and in dense breasts, but the difference was not statistically significant. Imaging findings for non-calcified DCIS were relatively non-specific.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all the malignant breast lesions in our study, a total of four lesions diagnosed as DCIS or mucinous carcinoma were classified as BI-RADS Category 3. DCIS and mucinous carcinomas are sometimes confused with benign lesions because they both appear as smooth-surfaced masses (24,25). Additional modalities have been added to B-mode US in order to improve its diagnostic efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the malignant breast lesions in our study, a total of four lesions diagnosed as DCIS or mucinous carcinoma were classified as BI-RADS Category 3. DCIS and mucinous carcinomas are sometimes confused with benign lesions because they both appear as smooth-surfaced masses (24,25). Additional modalities have been added to B-mode US in order to improve its diagnostic efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories 0 (requiring additional imaging evaluation or prior mammograms for comparison), 1 (negative), and 6 (known biopsy-proven malignancy) were not applicable, because this was a retrospective study. BI-RADS categories 2, 3, 4A were identified as negative, while categories 4B, 4C, and 5 were identified as positive [ 30 ]. The histopathology findings from surgery were used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of breast cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that tomosynthesis is better than mammography in cancer detection and lesion characterization . It can be predicted that these advantages would also contribute to specimen imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that tomosynthesis leads to increased rates of cancer detection in screening series . Tomosynthesis is also known to be better in lesion characterization than mammography . This study aimed to investigate the contribution of tomosynthesis to intraoperative specimen evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%