2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01875-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-cancer disease prevalence and association with occupational radiation exposure among Korean radiation workers

Abstract: Radiation-induced cancer risks have known stochastic effects; however, regarding non-cancer diseases, evidence of risk at low radiation doses remains unclear. We aimed to identify underlying characteristics concerning non-cancer disease prevalence and determine associations with radiation dose among Korean radiation workers. Using a nationwide baseline survey, 20,608 workers were enrolled. Data concerning participant demographics, occupational characteristics, lifestyle, and lifetime prevalence of non-cancer d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, information was more limited in the lower dose occupational or environmental studies (supplement table S3.5). In the lower dose studies of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors,20 Mayak workers,646566 and a few other occupationally9091929394 and environmentally exposed9596 groups, substantial information was available on lifestyle factors (supplement S3 table S3.5). In most groups that were exposed to radiation, lifestyle risk factors had little or no evidence of interacting with cardiovascular disease risk related to radiation 13192054565759606162636790919395979899.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, information was more limited in the lower dose occupational or environmental studies (supplement table S3.5). In the lower dose studies of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors,20 Mayak workers,646566 and a few other occupationally9091929394 and environmentally exposed9596 groups, substantial information was available on lifestyle factors (supplement S3 table S3.5). In most groups that were exposed to radiation, lifestyle risk factors had little or no evidence of interacting with cardiovascular disease risk related to radiation 13192054565759606162636790919395979899.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thyroid is among the most radiosensitive tissues in the body, and thyroid toxicity can happen with both occupational and medical radiation exposure, in children or adults [15] , [16] . It is well known that for cancer patients who receive RNI to the cervical or SCV nodal regions, incidental thyroid gland irradiation occurs and may cause various thyroid complications, the most common being RT-induced HT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrary, in studies on workers or in general population, generally few potential confounding variables can be collected as the large number of people recruited and the way of collecting the information does not usually allow such information to be obtained. In our systematic review [12], among the lower dose studies with detailed information on lifestyle factors and a large number of included people there were only a few occupational cohorts, principally the Mayak worker cohort [73][74][75][76][77][78], the Semipalatinsk cohort [90], and, with a rather smaller number of people included, the French nuclear fuel cycle workers [81,91] and the Korean radiation worker cohorts [82,92]. For the purposes of maximizing statistical power, speci c CVD outcomes are analyzed together, but potential confounders could act differently on the different outcomes and their speci c effect could be unseen in a pooled analysis of heterogeneous outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%