2000
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-class II HLA gene associated with type 1 diabetes maps to the 240-kb region near HLA-B.

Abstract: Several studies provide evidence that in addition to the DQ-DR genes, HLA contains another uncharacterized gene or genes associated with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to investigate the effect of this gene independently of the DQ-DR genes and to localize it with a matched case-control study. More than 1,400 patients and 30,000 control individuals from Finland were studied. They were first genotyped for the selected alleles of the HLA-DQB1, -DQA1, and -DRB1 genes. For the DR3/4(0404) genotype, 75 patients and 18… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
50
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this model has not explained why HLA-DRB1*0404 is not consistently associated with T1DM 3 (Table 1), since this allele invariably occurs with DQB1*0302. Undlien et al 3 suggested that DRB1*0404 confers resistance that counteracts the diabetogenic effect 15 Here we showed that carriage of C4B3 and HLA-B15 significantly enhanced the risk of diabetes in carriers of HLA-DRB1*0401; (Tables 1 and 3). While we did not eliminate a role for HLA-DQB1*0302, a gene in the central MHC would explain our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, this model has not explained why HLA-DRB1*0404 is not consistently associated with T1DM 3 (Table 1), since this allele invariably occurs with DQB1*0302. Undlien et al 3 suggested that DRB1*0404 confers resistance that counteracts the diabetogenic effect 15 Here we showed that carriage of C4B3 and HLA-B15 significantly enhanced the risk of diabetes in carriers of HLA-DRB1*0401; (Tables 1 and 3). While we did not eliminate a role for HLA-DQB1*0302, a gene in the central MHC would explain our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Allele 2 at this locus, located in the class III region, is positively associated with disease, again on the DQ2-DR3 haplotype, but independently of DQ2-DR3 itself. Similarly, in a Finnish study 9 an island of association with T1D, associated with DQ8-DR4 haplotypes but independent of the DQ8 or DR4 alleles themselves, was reported. The authors suggested that a disease locus could be mapped to a 240 kb region encompassing HLA-B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…41 In addition, it is possible that the same single locus in the class II-centromeric class I region also explains the heterogeneity in risk reported for DQ8-DRB1*0404 haplotypes in Finland. 7,9 Zavattari et al 10 suggested that three markers, DMB, DOB and TNFc, were independently associated with T1D, but these data could be explained by a single extended susceptibility haplotype. Nonetheless, Sardinian haplotypes differ significantly centromeric of DQB1, and a third non-DQ/DR variant reducing the DQ2-DR3 haplotype susceptibility in this population is a possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Furthermore, it indicates that our susceptibility locus maps away from the classical MHC, although additional risk loci are also believed to exist there, in particular for HLA-B. 25,[27][28][29] It is interesting to note that conditional logistic regression analyses in the T1DGC dataset showed that the associations with the PRSS16 SNPs and one of the BTN SNPs were independent of HLA-B, and also of the other class I loci. The associations with the PRSS16 SNPs also seemed independent of the earlier reported UBD and HLA-G associations, though some dependency was seen in the regression analyses between one of the HLA-G SNPs and one of the PRSS16 SNPs, even though there was hardly any LD between these SNPs when calculated on the basis of the entire T1DGC dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%