Progress in Commutative Algebra 1 2012
DOI: 10.1515/9783110250404.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-commutative Crepant Resolutions: Scenes From Categorical Geometry

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Non-commutative crepant resolutions are algebraic objects defined by Van den Bergh to realize an equivalence of derived categories in birational geometry. They are motivated by tilting theory, the McKay correspondence, and the minimal model program, and have applications to string theory and representation theory. In this expository article I situate Van den Bergh's definition within these contexts and describe some of the current research in the area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proof of this claim is provided at [14, Proposition 2.14]. The interested reader should consult these papers, and also [27], for further background of the connections with noncommutative resolution of singularities.…”
Section: Remarks 52 (I)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A proof of this claim is provided at [14, Proposition 2.14]. The interested reader should consult these papers, and also [27], for further background of the connections with noncommutative resolution of singularities.…”
Section: Remarks 52 (I)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sequence (1) is a projective resolution of A. Hence Λ has global dimension e. On the other hand, from [Ra] (see also [Le2]), it has global dimension d. Hence if d 2, then the equality in the theorem holds.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover if n is odd then Λ is a CohenMacaulay R := T Sp(V ) -module. In other words, in the terminology of [14,18], when n is odd Λ is a non-commutative crepant resolution (NCCR) of R.…”
Section: 1) D(λ) ֒→ D(z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly for a noetherian scheme/stack X we write D(X) := D b coh (X). If Y is the determinantal variety of n × n-matrices of rank ≤ r then in [2] (and independently in [5]) a "non-commutative crepant resolution" [14,18] Λ for k[Y ] was constructed. Such an NCCR is a k[Y ]-algebra which has in particular the property that D(Λ) is a "strongly crepant categorical resolution" of Perf(Y ) (the derived category of perfect complexes on Y ) in the sense of [12,Def.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%