2018
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2018.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-competes and Spinout Creation: A Cross-country Test of the Relationship with Individual Income

Abstract: This crosscountry study suggests that non-competes are not serving parent firms' intended purpose of discouraging the spinouts by higher earning employees. Instead, they have an untended consequence of mainly blocking the wrong types of spawn-that is, spinouts by lower earning employees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption implies that lower ability researchers are more affected by stronger IPR‐protection laws than higher ability researchers. Laplume, Yeganegi and Dass () use the education and income levels of employees along with survey evidence to show that non‐compete institutions are more effective at preventing employee entrepreneurship for low ability workers. As argued by the authors, higher ability researchers are more likely to have the ability and resources to overcome any legal barriers to entry.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption implies that lower ability researchers are more affected by stronger IPR‐protection laws than higher ability researchers. Laplume, Yeganegi and Dass () use the education and income levels of employees along with survey evidence to show that non‐compete institutions are more effective at preventing employee entrepreneurship for low ability workers. As argued by the authors, higher ability researchers are more likely to have the ability and resources to overcome any legal barriers to entry.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%