2014
DOI: 10.1111/oik.01774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐consumptive effects of avian predators on fish behavior and cascading indirect interactions in seagrasses

Abstract: Top–down impacts of avian predators are often overlooked in marine environments despite evidence from other systems that birds significantly impact animal distribution and behavior; instead, birds are typically recognized for the impacts of their nutrient rich guano. This is especially true in shallow seagrass meadows where restoration methods utilize bird perches or stakes to attract birds as a passive fertilizer delivery system that promotes the regrowth of damaged seagrasses. However, this method also incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(174 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a model osprey flying overhead resulted in significant behavioural modifications in nesting pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus (L. 1758), where the majority of predator‐exposed paternal fish temporarily abandoned their nests to find refuge away from the threat (Gallagher et al ., ). These insights, along with others (Hill & Heck, ; Pepino et al ., ; Steinmetz et al ., ), suggest that avian predators may exert top‐down influences on fish populations. However, the effects of avian predation on the physiological stress response of fish remains poorly characterised.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similarly, a model osprey flying overhead resulted in significant behavioural modifications in nesting pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus (L. 1758), where the majority of predator‐exposed paternal fish temporarily abandoned their nests to find refuge away from the threat (Gallagher et al ., ). These insights, along with others (Hill & Heck, ; Pepino et al ., ; Steinmetz et al ., ), suggest that avian predators may exert top‐down influences on fish populations. However, the effects of avian predation on the physiological stress response of fish remains poorly characterised.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…can affect fish distribution (Ryan et al 2013) and behavior and survival (Hill and Heck 2015;Pepino et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many terrestrial and avian predators kill and consume aquatic prey (e.g., Dalton et al 2009), the nonconsumptive effects of these interactions remain relatively understudied, particularly for large bird predators (Fauchald and Erikstad 2002;Steinmetz et al 2003;Zydelis and Kontautas 2008; but see recent work by Hill and Heck 2015;Pepino et al 2015). Here we used a realistic model of an Osprey (Pandion haliaetus (L., 1758)), a predatory fish specialist throughout most of its range, to test the hypothesis that the presence of aerial predators can significantly alter fish parental behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last post-doc who came to DISL and worked with me was Jennifer Hill. Jenn carried out interesting studies of predator-prey behavior (Hill and Heck 2015) and later with Sea Grant support investigated the impact of the non-native tiger shrimp (Penaus monodon) on the native shrimp species of the Gulf of Mexico (Hill et al 2017).…”
Section: The Growth Of Seagrass Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%