2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-cooperative power and latency aware load balancing in distributed data centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After experimentation, it is observed that it outperformed the other traditional algorithms. There are models available for load balancing between various data centers 18,19 . This is achieved by looking after the service type of the links.…”
Section: Literature Survey and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After experimentation, it is observed that it outperformed the other traditional algorithms. There are models available for load balancing between various data centers 18,19 . This is achieved by looking after the service type of the links.…”
Section: Literature Survey and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, the algorithmic game theory is a significant growth area in theoretical computer science. There are different game-theoretical approaches available like cooperative and non-cooperative games [21,22], symmetric and non-symmetric, simultaneous and sequential move games, constant sum, zerosum and non-zero-sum games. Stackelberg model is one of the strategic game models in which the leader firm makes its first move, and then the follower firm makes its next move sequentially [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subrata et al (2007) proposed a non-cooperative game-based framework to solve the allocation problem in computational grids. Tripathi et al (2017) considered the allocation problem in distributed data centers. Xiao et al (2017) considered interconnected systems and proposed a fairness aware resource allocation scheme using Q-learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%