2013
DOI: 10.1002/poc.3250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-covalent interactions in receptor-ligand complexes. A study based on the electron charge density

Abstract: In this paper, we reported the results obtained by charge density analysis of the network of non‐covalent interactions (NCI) established in the binding pocket of a receptor, in relevant conformations of ligand – receptor complexes. Starting with strong and moderate hydrogen bonds, moving on to weaker polar interactions and ending with stacking and T‐shape like interactions between aromatic rings, all of them have been investigated within the framework of the density functional theory and the quantum theory of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the compounds herein studied displayed their pharmacophoric portions in a closely related spatial form to that reported for dopamine [17,34] and other dopaminergic ligands [35]. Consistently with previous experimental [36] and theoretical [37] data, the simulations indicated the relevance of negatively charged aspartate 114 and 103 for D 2 and D 1 DR ligand binding, respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Modelingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In general, the compounds herein studied displayed their pharmacophoric portions in a closely related spatial form to that reported for dopamine [17,34] and other dopaminergic ligands [35]. Consistently with previous experimental [36] and theoretical [37] data, the simulations indicated the relevance of negatively charged aspartate 114 and 103 for D 2 and D 1 DR ligand binding, respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Modelingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, a more careful inspection of the intermolecular interactions at the substitution point reveals important differences in the interaction patterns. The charge density molecular graphs from Figures as well as previous results show that the ligand phenolic OH groups tend to act either as H‐bond donor against the hydroxyl oxygen of the serine residues in the binding pocket or to form oxygen‐oxygen interactions with them . On the other hand, the halogen rarely interacts with the hydroxyl oxygen of the serine residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been proven that the sum of the ρ b values (∑ρ) for all the interactions established by the ligand molecule is a good measure of its anchoring strength to the binding pocket. Furthermore, the ∑ρ value corresponding to the interactions established by a particular group of atoms of the ligand molecule is a measure of the anchoring strength of that group to the binding pocket . The ability to decompose the interaction energy in contributions by atom or group of atoms makes the QTAIM analysis particularly useful in analysis, design and optimization of ligand molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many works discussing this interesting problem in the literature. Our own studies have demonstrated the importance to include QTAIM analysis to solve these intricacies . Thus, in the next step of our study we performed a QTAIM study of these complexes using B3LYP‐D/6‐31G(d) calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the noncovalent interactions generally are weaker than the covalent ones, it is evident that they are more difficult to be properly described. However, recent advances in computational calculation of the electron charge density have made possible the proper description of the three‐dimensional network of bonding and nonbonding interactions in different biological systems in the context of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) . Thus, it is now possible to study more accurately the effects of substitutes ligands (bearing small structural modifications) when they interact with their biological receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%