Non-deceptive counterfeit products: a morphological analysis of literature and future research agenda

Samaddar, Kaushik; Menon, Preetha

doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1772348

Cited by 38 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 103 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A meta -analysis requires a vast body of literature in the field of study. In an MA (e.g., Goel et al, 2019 , Kumar and Ganesh, 2009 , Samaddar and Menon, 2020 , Sudhindra et al, 2014 , Sunder et al, 2018 , Sunder and Mahalingam, 2018 ), the existing body of literature is organized into conceptual dimensions, sub-dimensions, and variants (called Morphological Framework), which together represent the conceptual space of the topic at hand. The VIM presents the intersections (cross-matches) among the dimensions in an MA to help identify the full set of potential gaps, from which the relevant gaps are qualified using logical rules.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis

Baliga

Chawla

et al. 2021

Journal of Business Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis

Baliga

Chawla

et al. 2021

Journal of Business Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is vital to note that constructing a MA framework calls for judgement, and it is very likely possible that different MA frameworks may emerge out from the work of different authors with the same set of dimensions. With thorough intellectual discussions and critical analysis, dimensions of all the MA frameworks were collated to form a unified structure consisting of broad dimensions, sub-dimensions and options (Samaddar and Menon, 2020) (Table 4).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the dimensions identified and established in the MA framework, the study constructed a CCM to locate the missing links for further study. CCM is a combination of various dimensions which are compared with each other and their relationships are recorded (Samaddar and Menon, 2020). The researchers constructed ( n −1) x ( n −1) matrix where “ n ” denotes the total number of broad dimensions identified by the MA framework.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the current issues, challenges and opportunities in tea tourism: a morphological analysis

Mondal

Samaddar

2021

IJCTHR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In quest of exploring the issues, challenges and opportunities prevailing in the tea tourism industry, this study aims to present a comprehensive morphological analysis (MA). More specifically, it identifies critical dimensions that bear significance for the sustainable growth of tea tourism. Design/methodology/approach The present study adopted a triangulation method of research involving an ethnographic study (ES) followed by a series of focus group sessions carried out from the prominent tea-producing districts in India. This study accords equal importance to both the demand and supply perspectives of tea tourism and its stakeholders. Findings Critical dimensions such as improper planning and marketing efforts, limited collaboration among stakeholders, the involvement of local people, socio-economic inequality and consumer’s attitude towards tea tourism were identified as major issues and challenges. Research limitations/implications The present research limits its scope to the geographical boundary within India keeping cross-boundary research for future study. This study will aid future researchers and scholars in expanding the domain of tea tourism. Practical implications The present study bears significance to the policymakers, governing bodies, marketers, tour operators in embracing a socio-economic perspective while undertaking a suitable strategy towards marketing of tea tourism and ensuring its sustainable development. Originality/value This study makes a novel attempt in blending the ES, focus group sessions and MA, together in a single research initiative, making it a single point reference in tea tourism literature.

show abstract

“…Further, because of the different levels of legal restrictions on counterfeiting across countries (Green & Smith, 2002; Sinha & Mandel, 2008), consumers' perceptions of LCP may vary, leading to different intentions for CLB. As a result, future studies should conduct cross‐cultural studies to broaden the current understanding and provide novice insights into the field (Eisend et al., 2017; Samaddar & Menon, 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because of these distinct characteristics, the effects of idealism and PBH on the attitude toward LCP and the willingness to buy CLB may differ between these two countries (Eisend et al., 2017; Samaddar & Menon, 2020). Idealism is closely associated with concerning the welfare of others (i.e., egalitarianism) (Forsyth, 2020) and materialism is related to the values of social power and wealth (i.e., hierarchy) (Kasser, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury brands: A cross‐cultural comparison

Tunçel

2021

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the impact of idealism, possession‐based happiness, and the attitude toward the legality of counterfeits on the willingness to buy counterfeit luxury brands in Turkey and Slovenia. Data are collected from 205 consumers in Slovenia and 224 consumers in Turkey and analysed using Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling. The results confirm a negative impact of idealism on the attitude toward the legality of counterfeits and a positive impact of this attitude on the willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury brands. Turkish consumers show a positive effect of possession‐based happiness on the attitude toward counterfeits. The impact of idealism and possession‐based happiness on the willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury brands among Slovenian or Turkish consumers was not found. The study contributes to the literature by providing a cross‐cultural focus on specific personal antecedents, which the current literature has limited knowledge of and conflicting findings.

show abstract

Non-deceptive counterfeit products: a morphological analysis of literature and future research agenda

Cited by 38 publications

References 103 publications

Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis

Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis

Exploring the current issues, challenges and opportunities in tea tourism: a morphological analysis

Willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury brands: A cross‐cultural comparison

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About