2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10474-015-0515-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-degeneracy of the discriminant

Abstract: Let $(l,f):(C^2,0)\rightarrow (C^2,0)$ be the germ of a holomorphic mapping such that $l=0$ is a smooth curve which is not a branch of the singular curve $f=0$. The direct image of the critical locus of this mapping is called the discriminant curve. In this paper we study the pairs $(l,f)$ for which the discriminant curve is non-degenerate in the Kouchnirenko sense

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes a characterization of the atypical values of the pencils fk=tgl$f^k=tg^l$ and of the asymptotic critical values of the meromorphic functions fk/gl$f^k/g^l$. We also propose an alternative proof of [6, Theorem 6.6] by an argument similar to the proof of the main result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This includes a characterization of the atypical values of the pencils fk=tgl$f^k=tg^l$ and of the asymptotic critical values of the meromorphic functions fk/gl$f^k/g^l$. We also propose an alternative proof of [6, Theorem 6.6] by an argument similar to the proof of the main result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This includes a characterization of the atypical values of the pencils f k = tg l and of the asymptotic critical values of the meromorphic functions f k /g l . We also propose an alternative proof of [GGL,Theorem 6.6] by an argument similar to the proof of the main result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Theorem 5.4 ( [GGL,Theorem 6.6]) Let h = 0 be a unitangent singular curve and let ℓ 1 = 0, ℓ 2 = 0 be smooth curves transverse to h = 0. Then there exists a nonzero constant d ∈ C such that the initial Newton polynomials of discriminants of mappings (dℓ 1 , h) : (C 2 , 0) → (C 2 , 0) and (ℓ 2 , h) : (C 2 , 0) → (C 2 , 0) are equal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof For genus 2, and after the second part of [5,Corollary 4.4] we get that D(u, v) = 0 is nondegenerate and we can determine its topological type from its Newton polygon (see [13,Proposition 4.7] and [6, Theorem 3.2]), which is the jacobian Newton polygon of (x, f ) (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Proposition 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] the authors study the pairs ( , f ) for which the discriminant curve is nondegenerate in the Kouchnirenko sense. In particular, when f is irreducible, after [5,Corollary 4.4] the discriminant curve D(u, v) = 0 is nondegenerate if and only if the multiplicity of f (x, y) = 0 equals 2 or equals 4 and the genus equals 2. Otherwise the discriminant curve is degenerate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%