2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2005.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive analysis and testing of museum objects: An overview of 5 years of research

Abstract: This paper gives an overview of research in or associated with the pan-European network COST Action G8, which aims at achieving a better preservation and conservation of our cultural heritage by increasing the knowledge of art and archaeological objects through advanced chemical and physical analyses. The paper is focussed on the use of various analytical techniques for the examination of cultural heritage materials and includes research examples on painted works of art, ceramics, glasses, glazes and metals. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
62
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Oen, in such cases sampling is performed for the investigation of cross-sections with e.g. optical microscopy or SEM-EDX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Oen, in such cases sampling is performed for the investigation of cross-sections with e.g. optical microscopy or SEM-EDX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, being set on historical valuable objects, gems cannot be removed to avoid irreversible damages. Thanks to recent technique advancements aimed at developing high-resolution mobile equipment for in-situ works (Adriaens 2005;Vandenabeele et al 2014), complementary non-invasive and non-destructive methods have emerged as a promising approach for gem characterization. Specifically, the combined use of portable spectroscopic methods, such as Raman spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence, has demonstrated useful results for routine investigation of gems (Petrovà et al 2012;Lauwers et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical procedure applied was totally non-destructive as sampling was restricted in view of the value, the uniqueness, the size and the extremely fragile nature of the material (European Commission, 2003). As Adriaens (2005Adriaens ( , p. 1504 emphatically states: 'there is one essential difference between the analysis of ancient and modern materials -an art object or ancient artefact cannot be replaced, and the consumption or damaging of even a small part of it for analytical purposes must be undertaken only where vital data cannot otherwise be obtained'. The final aim of the project was the creation of accurate replicas which are now exhibited alongside the originals in the Pylos Archaeological Museum, using similar composition mortars, pigments, and manufacture techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%