2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive, quantitative characterization of extruded starch-based products by magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray microtomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been used to quantitatively analyze the geometrical distribution of fat and proteins in meat products (Frisullo, 2009), to understand the role of sugar and fat in cookies (Pareyt et al, 2009), apple tissue (Mendoza et al, 2007), and to investigate the rise of dough (Bellido, 2006). Recently, micro CT was used to generate high-resolution 2D and 3D microstructures of bread (Besbes et al, 2013; Cafarelli et al, 2014; Demirkesen et al, 2014; Van Dyck et al, 2014), and extruded starch products (Horvat et al, 2014) in order to characterize the structure of product to its ingredients properties, or processing conditions. In all these cases, image processing tools and algorithms were utilized to quantify structural characteristics of the food products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used to quantitatively analyze the geometrical distribution of fat and proteins in meat products (Frisullo, 2009), to understand the role of sugar and fat in cookies (Pareyt et al, 2009), apple tissue (Mendoza et al, 2007), and to investigate the rise of dough (Bellido, 2006). Recently, micro CT was used to generate high-resolution 2D and 3D microstructures of bread (Besbes et al, 2013; Cafarelli et al, 2014; Demirkesen et al, 2014; Van Dyck et al, 2014), and extruded starch products (Horvat et al, 2014) in order to characterize the structure of product to its ingredients properties, or processing conditions. In all these cases, image processing tools and algorithms were utilized to quantify structural characteristics of the food products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special sample preparation is needed for both negative and positive imaging with MRI. A major advantage of XMT over MRI is the good spatial resolution which could be reached without using extensive sample preparation with statistically similar results (Horvat et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Pore size distribution of starch-based corn flour extrudates was determined and compared by MRI and XMT imaging (Horvat et al 2014). Extrudates with different pore sizes were produced by varying mechanical energy input (163-170-247 Wh/ kg; Fig.…”
Section: Aq5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to observe extruded starch, Horvat et al. made a negative image with the sample immersed in cyclohexane to clearly visualise the walls and pores of the processed snack .…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another work, the structure of the tomato pericarp was visualised to relate to its peelability and resistance during subsequent processing . Additionally, MRI was very useful for the non‐destructive characterisation of the pore structure and moisture of an extruded starch product (snack), which was easily evaluated from the images .…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%