2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-dominated sorting genetic-based algorithm for exploiting a large-sized fuzzy outranking relation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we need specific procedures in order to derive a consensus ranking. We propose the procedure which finds its roots in [31,58,59]. Our approach for exploitation a fuzzy outranking relation to derive a ranking is to use a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm-based heuristic method.…”
Section: Outranking Approach For Multi-network Disease Gene Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we need specific procedures in order to derive a consensus ranking. We propose the procedure which finds its roots in [31,58,59]. Our approach for exploitation a fuzzy outranking relation to derive a ranking is to use a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm-based heuristic method.…”
Section: Outranking Approach For Multi-network Disease Gene Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of space limitations, we omitted the presentation of the ranking procedure. In order to address this gap, the reader can consult the paper [31].…”
Section: Outranking Approach For Multi-network Disease Gene Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multicriteria decision analysis tool used to carry out the evaluation and final ranking of the capital cities is the hierarchical ELECTRE III (h-ELECTRE III) method [23], [24], which through its criteria hierarchy, outranking, and preference and indifference thresholds concepts make it an acceptable way to be used in situations such as those presented in the study. It should be noted that for the exploitation of the comprehensive fuzzy outranking relation and the partial fuzzy outranking relations related to non-elementary criteria, a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) was used [20], [25]. The result of this MOEA is a ranking (a total preorder of classes of alternatives) of the 31 capital cities with the best public security in decreasing order of evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSGA-II is based on reducing the differences between the valued outranking relation 𝑆𝑆 𝐴𝐴 𝜎𝜎 and the final ranking. More information on this algorithm is provided in the work byLeyva-López et al (2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%