2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2019.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-equilibrium and stationary fluctuations for the SSEP with slow boundary

Abstract: We derive the non-equilibrium fluctuations of one-dimensional symmetric simple exclusion processes in contact with slowed stochastic reservoirs which are regulated by a factor n −θ . Depending on the range of θ we obtain processes with various boundary conditions. Moreover, as a consequence of the previous result we deduce the non-equilibrium stationary fluctuations by using the matrix ansatz method which gives us information on the stationary measure for the model. The main ingredient to prove these results i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proof of the log-Sobolev inequatily is based on a simple, albeit powerful observation: one can combine the Glauber dynamics at the reservoirs with the exclusion dynamics at the interior of the interval in order to compare the exclusion process with reservoirs with a Glauber dynamics that acts on each site of the interval. This comparison principle holds true even if the reservoirs are slow [2,7], see Theorem 3.4. It is interesting to observe that our diffusive bounds on the log-Sobolev constant of the exclusion process in contact with reservoirs hold true exactly up to the same slow scale on which the reservoirs modify the hydrodynamic behavior of the system [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our proof of the log-Sobolev inequatily is based on a simple, albeit powerful observation: one can combine the Glauber dynamics at the reservoirs with the exclusion dynamics at the interior of the interval in order to compare the exclusion process with reservoirs with a Glauber dynamics that acts on each site of the interval. This comparison principle holds true even if the reservoirs are slow [2,7], see Theorem 3.4. It is interesting to observe that our diffusive bounds on the log-Sobolev constant of the exclusion process in contact with reservoirs hold true exactly up to the same slow scale on which the reservoirs modify the hydrodynamic behavior of the system [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We observe that when α = 1 this model differs from the usual SSEP because it allows more than one particle per site and this difference, at the level of the microscopic dynamics, results in having a model that is not solvable by a matrix ansatz formulation unless α = 1 and, as a consequence, there is not much information about its non-equilibrium stationary measure. For α = 1, the matrix ansatz method developed by [5] allows getting information on its non-equilibrium stationary measure, which in turn enables one to obtain explicitly the stationary correlations of the system for any value of θ ∈ , see, for example, Section 2.2 of [7] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrostatics in the other cases is left open. The second problem is the analysis of the non-equilibrium fluctuations, which is well known for the case α = 1, see [7] and references therein. We also highlight that our replacement lemmas are the building blocks in order to analyse the equilibrium fluctuations and the large deviations principle for our model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the simple structure of the model, it has attracted a lot of attention since then. The equilibrium/non-equilibrium fluctuations from the hydrodynamic limit are considered in [9,11]. The large deviation of the SSEP with slow boundary are investigated in [2,6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%