2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-016-1699-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-equilibrium Dynamics for a Widom–Rowlinson Type Model with Mutations

Abstract: A dynamical version of the Widom-Rowlinsom model in the continuum is considered. The dynamics is modelled by a spatial two-component birth-and-death Glauber process where particles, in addition, are allowed to change their type with density dependent rates. An evolution of states is constructed as the unique weak solution to the associated Fokker-Planck equation. Such solution is obtained by means of its correlation functions which belong to a certain Ruelle space. Existence of a unique invariant measure and e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we closely follow the arguments in [FK16b] (see also [Fri17]). Since the necessary computations are very similar to the latter works, we give only the main steps of proof.…”
Section: Two Interacting Bdlp-modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we closely follow the arguments in [FK16b] (see also [Fri17]). Since the necessary computations are very similar to the latter works, we give only the main steps of proof.…”
Section: Two Interacting Bdlp-modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…provided one side of the equality is finite for |G|, cf. [Fri17]. Moreover by [Fin11b] we have λ`tη˘P Γ0 | ξ˘X η˘‰ Hu˘" 0, ξ˘P Γ0 (3.2) and λ b λ`tη P Γ 2 0 | η`X η´‰ Hu˘" 0.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that the weak formulation of the Fokker-Planck equation (1.3) does not require that µ t also provides a classical solution to (1.4). An extension of this uniqueness statement (without requiring that k µt is a classical solution to (1.4)) was given in [FK16,Fri17,FK18a]. The latter result was essentially based on [WZ02,WZ06].…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%