2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.12683
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Equilibrium Steady State of the Lieb-Liniger model: exact treatment of the Tonks Girardeau limit

Spyros Sotiriadis

Abstract: Aiming at studying the emergence of Non-Equilibrium Steady States (NESS) in quantum integrable models by means of an exact analytical method, we focus on the Tonks-Girardeau or hard-core boson limit of the Lieb-Liniger model. We consider the abrupt expansion of a gas from one half to the entire confining box, a prototypical case of inhomogeneous quench, also known as "geometric quench". Based on the exact calculation of quench overlaps, we develop an analytical method for the derivation of the NESS by rigorous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some elements of the theory can be considered proven, for example key statements about the mean values of current operators (see the review [12]), but it would be desirable to rigorously prove more aspects of the theory. It was shown in the remarkable work [13] that certain statements of GGE and GHD can be checked in the Lieb-Liniger model in a large coupling expansion; up to date this result is one of the most convincing analytic checks of GGE and GHD (for closely related works see [10,11,[14][15][16]). Nevertheless there remains a need for simple toy models, which have genuine interactions in them, and which can lead to exact proofs of the GHD predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some elements of the theory can be considered proven, for example key statements about the mean values of current operators (see the review [12]), but it would be desirable to rigorously prove more aspects of the theory. It was shown in the remarkable work [13] that certain statements of GGE and GHD can be checked in the Lieb-Liniger model in a large coupling expansion; up to date this result is one of the most convincing analytic checks of GGE and GHD (for closely related works see [10,11,[14][15][16]). Nevertheless there remains a need for simple toy models, which have genuine interactions in them, and which can lead to exact proofs of the GHD predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In an earlier work [1], we have studied the expansion of a Tonks-Girardeau gas from one half to the entire confining box and demonstrated how the emergence of Non-Equilibrium Steady States (NESS) can be derived from the asymptotics of the many-body wave-function in the combined thermodynamic and large distance and time limit. We avoided using the effectively free fermionic nature of the system, aiming to develop an exact method for the derivation of the asymptotics in the many-body context that would be suitable for generalisation to the genuinely interacting case of the Lieb-Liniger gas at arbitrary repulsive interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above outlined method has not been applied to out-of-equilibrium problems so far. Here, our goal is to generalise the method in the form shown in [1] to the genuinely interacting case of the Lieb-Liniger model at arbitrary interaction c > 0. In particular, we focus on the time evolved many-body wavefunction after the quench and derive a multiple integral representation for it, thus accomplishing the first step of the above general approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(D1). Taking into account the series of residues at these poles we obtain As a consequence we obtain the expressions for the density (57) and the current (58) in the ray-regime at finite temperature.…”
Section: B3 Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 5 we obtain the finite time kernel in the limit → +∞. To this aim we have adapted a trick based on contour integrals used in [50] (see also [57,58]). As we show in that section, the study of the limit → +∞ turns out to be more involved in the present continuum setting with a correlated initial condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%