2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-equilibrium theories for macroscale heat transfer: ablative composite layer systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If local mass equilibrium models have received a large attention in the past due their simplicity [e.g., Kansa et al [25]; cf. Morales-Zarate et al [37] for the application to a reactive three-phase system], specific precaution must be taken with reactive systems for which the assumption of small gradients is sometimes hard to verify [44,33]. Intrinsically, indeed, the presence of reactive source terms induce concentration gradients which can be more or less important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If local mass equilibrium models have received a large attention in the past due their simplicity [e.g., Kansa et al [25]; cf. Morales-Zarate et al [37] for the application to a reactive three-phase system], specific precaution must be taken with reactive systems for which the assumption of small gradients is sometimes hard to verify [44,33]. Intrinsically, indeed, the presence of reactive source terms induce concentration gradients which can be more or less important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonlyadopted approach to this coupling is to utilize a quasi-steady assumption; this implies that the evolution of the system geometry occurs on a time scale large compared with the time scale for mass transfer processes [58,42]. This time-evolving interface problem is similar to the one encountered in dissolution/precipitation [20] or in combustion in porous media [25,44,33], to cite only those, for which the quasi-steady assumption is classically adopted.…”
Section: Microscale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [184,185]. However, in most fire-related studies it is assumed that the solid and gaseous phases are in thermal equilibrium due to the much smaller volumetric heat capacity of the volatiles [70][71][72].…”
Section: Convection Advection and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Puiroux [20], solid and gas phases are in thermal equilibrium as long as the Péclet number for diffusion of heat within the pores is small (P e = g ρ g c p,g d p v g /k g ). In most of the applications of interest for space agencies, the small pore size (< 100µm) and the slow pyrolysis gas flow (v g ∼ 1m/s) insure a small Péclet number: the gas temperature accommodates to the solid temperature within the pores [5].…”
Section: Iiic Energy Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%