2001
DOI: 10.1007/pl00005885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-existence of certain semistable abelian varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iv) Results of Fontaine, Brumer-Kramer and Schoof [20], [11], [39] which determine semistable abelian varieties over Q of small conductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Results of Fontaine, Brumer-Kramer and Schoof [20], [11], [39] which determine semistable abelian varieties over Q of small conductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since inertia at 2 and 3 acts through a cyclic subgroup of order 5, we also have ramification bounds at 2 and 3. As in Schoof [12] and Brumer-Kramer [1], we obtain the following estimate of the root discriminant…”
Section: Lemma 210mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our technique for proving these results is linked strongly to the ideas in Brumer-Kramer [1] and Schoof [12], and thus we consider it important to briefly recall the main ideas of these papers now. Schoof's approach is similar in spirit to Fontaine's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, above Theorem implies that there are no such (nontrivial) abelian varieties Y (first proved in [13,27]). Our result also eliminates a great deal of other varieties, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%