2010
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2010.59.3884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non existence of principal values of signed Riesz transforms of non integer dimension

Abstract: In this paper we prove that, given s ≥ 0, and a Borel non zero measure µ in R m , if for µ-almost every x ∈ R m the limit lim ε→0 |x−y|>ε x − y |x − y| s+1 dµ(y) exists and 0 < lim sup r →0 µ(B(x, r))/r s < ∞, then s in an integer. In particular, if E ⊂ R m is a set with positive and bounded s-dimensional Hausdorff measure H s and for H s-almost every x ∈ E the limit lim ε→0 |x−y|>ε x − y |x − y| s+1 dH s |E (y) exists, then s is an integer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mayboroda-Volberg Theorem. Building on the tools developed in [Tol1,RdVT], Mayboroda and Volberg [MV1,MV2] proved that if µ is a non-trivial finite measure with H s (supp(µ)) < ∞, and S µ (1) < ∞ µ-almost everywhere, then s ∈ Z and supp(µ) is s-rectifiable (see Section 2.6 below for the definition). When combined with Theorem 1.1 of Azzam-Tolsa [AT], Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 above provide another demonstration of this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mayboroda-Volberg Theorem. Building on the tools developed in [Tol1,RdVT], Mayboroda and Volberg [MV1,MV2] proved that if µ is a non-trivial finite measure with H s (supp(µ)) < ∞, and S µ (1) < ∞ µ-almost everywhere, then s ∈ Z and supp(µ) is s-rectifiable (see Section 2.6 below for the definition). When combined with Theorem 1.1 of Azzam-Tolsa [AT], Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 above provide another demonstration of this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 are both sharp for the s-Riesz kernel K(x) = x |x| s+1 . Indeed, we recall the following theorem, which is a consequence of results by Mattila-Preiss [22], Tolsa [32] and Ruiz de Villa-Tolsa [28]. For a relatively simple direct proof, see [11,Theorem 1.2].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Let us mention that, for the Cauchy transform, the same results were obtained in [19] with some density assumptions, and in [29] by using the notion of curvature of measures. For other results dealing with principal values, Hausdorff measures, rectifiability, and related questions, see also [8], [23], [6], [33], [27], and [28], for example.…”
Section: Vii-4mentioning
confidence: 99%