2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00020-012-2018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Existence of Subordinate Solutions for Jacobi Operators in Some Critical Cases

Abstract: Abstract. We show a method of repairing some gaps in proofs of the absolute continuity of the spectrum of Jacobi operators. Such gaps have been found in several recent papers, dealing mainly with the so-called critical case (i.e., Jordan box case). We solve the problem by proving that the subordinate solution does not exist for many cases with two linearly independent generalised eigenvectors possessing "similar" asymptotic behaviour.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 47B25, 47B36, 47B39, 47A10, 39A11,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise description of this problem and its solution (in our setting) the reader will find in the next section. In [9] M. Moszyński investigates this problem in general situation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Precise description of this problem and its solution (in our setting) the reader will find in the next section. In [9] M. Moszyński investigates this problem in general situation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of situation was studied by M.Moszyński in [9]. Unfortunately particular results of his paper do not cover Jacobi operators considered in this paper.…”
Section: Wojciech Motykamentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different spectral results could be related to different kinds of asymptotic properties. And for some asymptotic properties the use of 2d-generalized eigenvectors can be more suitable than the use of generalized eigenvectorssee, e.g., [10]. These methods, however, are less developed in the case of block Jacobi operators (with d > 1).…”
Section: Jacobi Operators: Generalized Eigenvectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The name C 2 -vector-generalised eigenvector was also used for d = 1-see, e.g.,[10] 3 Note that it is equall to the minimal s-number of A. And it is not a norm in B(X), if dim X > 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%