2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1355-0306(03)71778-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-forensic remains: the use of forensic archaeology, anthropology and burial taphonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification and processing of human skeletal remains received into a Medical Examiner office or similar setting are largely based upon their taphonomic state, including markers of previous burial or other depositional environments (including surface decomposition and dispersal in a forest or recovery from a marine environment) . The taphonomic alterations to bone caused by different depositional environments and the duration of deposition can be used to separate remains into the following categories : (i) recent remains, sometimes with associated soft tissue, that are of definite forensic interest; (ii) cemetery remains, whether recent or not, that likely do not represent criminal activity other than possible vandalism of burial sites; (iii) remains derived from historical/archaeological burials, which normally become the responsibility of state archaeological agencies ; (iv) remains likely derived from anatomical teaching, trophy, and/or ritual contexts, which probably have not been buried ; and (v) unknown remains that do not fit easily into any of the above‐mentioned categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification and processing of human skeletal remains received into a Medical Examiner office or similar setting are largely based upon their taphonomic state, including markers of previous burial or other depositional environments (including surface decomposition and dispersal in a forest or recovery from a marine environment) . The taphonomic alterations to bone caused by different depositional environments and the duration of deposition can be used to separate remains into the following categories : (i) recent remains, sometimes with associated soft tissue, that are of definite forensic interest; (ii) cemetery remains, whether recent or not, that likely do not represent criminal activity other than possible vandalism of burial sites; (iii) remains derived from historical/archaeological burials, which normally become the responsibility of state archaeological agencies ; (iv) remains likely derived from anatomical teaching, trophy, and/or ritual contexts, which probably have not been buried ; and (v) unknown remains that do not fit easily into any of the above‐mentioned categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain antropologi forensik, arkeologi forensik adalah disiplin yang cepat berkembang dalam bidang arkeologi, yang dirancang untuk membantu pihak kepolisian dan aparat penegak hukum lain dengan berbagai keterampilan yang begitu khusus (Dirkmaat & Adovasio, 1997;Hugland, 2001;Owsley, 2001;Hunter, 2002;Skinner et al, 2003;Gould, 2004a;Gould, 2004b;Ferlini, 2007;Cox et al, 2008;Litherland et al, 2008;Davenport & Harrison 2011;Dupras et al, 2012). Keterampilanketerampilan ini berkisar dari identifikasi sisa-sisa hayat dari lokasi-lokasi kubur klandestin, penggalian dan perekamannya yang (Skinner, 1987;Hoshower, 1998;Neave, 2000;Hugland, 2001;Owsley, 2001;Hochrein, 2002;Hunter, 2002;Duhig, 2003;Hunter & Cox, 2005a, 2005bJessee & Skinner, 2005;Menez, 2005;Tuller & Đurić, 2006;Bernardi & Fondebrider, 2007;Cox et al, 2008;Dirkmaat et al, 2008;Cheetham & Hanson, 2009;Holland & Connell, 2009;Barone, 2012;Cabo et al, 2012;Dupras et al, 2012;Tuller, 2012;Hunter et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified