Non-Formal Cultural Infrastructure in Peripheral Regions: Responsibility, Resources, and Regional Disparities

Abstract

Non-formal cultural education (NCE) infrastructure has recently been at the centre of discussion regarding the promotion of equal opportunities as well as social cohesion and resilience. The German government strives to ensure equivalent living conditions, including access to education throughout the country. Although NCE infrastructure is considered a service of general interest, it is a voluntary service that districts are not obliged to provide. Research shows that NCE infrastructure provision and funding vary significantly between regions and that qualitative case analyses are needed to adequately contextualise key factors for the provision of NCE infrastructure. These developments and findings raise many questions against the background of spatially differentiated socio-economic landscapes. The article analyses two peripheral regions in Germany by examining key factors for the local provision of NCE infrastructure based on content analysis of qualitative interviews. This article aims to understand how NCE infrastructure is provided in peripheral regions to discuss the effect of these dynamics on the development of equivalent living conditions in Germany. The results show that citizens in peripheral areas have found alternative ways of providing NCE infrastructure due to the lack of financial resources available from the public sector. Self-responsibilisation, civic engagement, and individual commitment provide and sustain large parts of NCE infrastructure in rural areas. These developments impede the provision of equivalent living conditions in Germany while enabling a more resilient community through civic engagement. This article, therefore, provides an important contribution to the discourse on social and regional inequality.

Community development programs in Rural Africa: An effectiveness review

“…The impact of intertribal conflict on educational development and the education crisis in Yemen underscores the need for holistic approaches to address social and political challenges that hinder educational progress (Taher et al, 2022). Furthermore, the responsibility and resources for non-formal cultural infrastructure in peripheral regions have been recognized as crucial components in promoting local economies and securing democracy, emphasizing the broader societal impact of educational infrastructure (Fobel, 2022).…”

The Challenges of Social Infrastructure for Urban Planning

“…The funding mechanisms, resources, and incentives to develop spaces that cannot be commodities in a "market" is a concern for many authors. Hence the contribution by Fobel (2022), who finds the provision of social infrastructure in peripheral regions is the result of committed individuals, voluntary work, and non-profit actors and the securing of third-party funds at higher levels of government or from foundations or fees. The changing role of student housing as social infrastructure is addressed by Franz and Gruber (2022), who look at the shift from providing student housing as a basic need to providing it as part of the financialised housing market, and by extension the implications for the provision of social spaces for students.…”