2011
DOI: 10.1002/spe.1084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐functional information transmission patterns for distributed real‐time Java

Abstract: SUMMARY Many real‐time systems use preemptive priority‐based scheduling in their internals to guarantee certain real‐time performance. This includes technologies that range from The Real‐Time Specification for Java (RTSJ) to middleware like Real‐Time Common Object Request Broker Architecture (RT‐CORBA), which offers additional models and policies that blend client and server information. This decision eases the integration of real‐time admission tests and dispatching policies in these types of infrastructures.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary in that system to define the mechanisms of selection of components, application composition and a distributed scheduling to allow the development of fully distributed applications. Current distributed real-time Java technology has not addressed reconfiguration based on SOA [43], although some mechanisms proposed by the authors can be useful as a basic support for dynamic reconfiguration [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary in that system to define the mechanisms of selection of components, application composition and a distributed scheduling to allow the development of fully distributed applications. Current distributed real-time Java technology has not addressed reconfiguration based on SOA [43], although some mechanisms proposed by the authors can be useful as a basic support for dynamic reconfiguration [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these result were obtained on DREQUIEMI [14], [32], [33] (ii) to evaluate the performance on an industrial benchmark; and (iii) to measure the overhead introduced by the distributed event model on the former distributed event model of the DRTSJ.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on an industrial use-case defined in [33] for AUTOSAR applications. The frequency of the tasks in the framework ranges from 83 Hz to 0.25 kHz and all tasks have to meet their deadlines before their next release (i.e.,…”
Section: B Industrial Use-case Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COMPOSING AND SCHEDULING TT-DISTRIBUTED RT-JAVA SOAS 153 used by distributed real-time applications, such as the concept of connection-pool, memory-pool and thread-pool or the usage of a distributed garbage collector, defining a dual programming model that allows the choice of between a development based on remote invocation or based on distributed events [7][8][9]. Service-oriented paradigms have been successfully applied to distributed environments, increasing their flexibility and allowing the reusability of their components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%