2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.31.543080
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-genetic differences underlie variability in proliferation among esophageal epithelial clones

Abstract: The growth potential of individual epithelial cells is a key determinant of tissue development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Although it is known that epithelial progenitor cells vary in their proliferative capacity, the cell states underlying these differences are yet to be uncovered. Here we performed clonal tracing through imaging and cellular barcoding of an in vitro model of esophageal epithelial cells (EPC2-hTERT). We found that individual clones possess unique growth and differentiation capacit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous contribution, we investigated dilution-based negative feedback [97], where increasing concentration increases the cellular growth (dilution) rate. This would be the case for many cellular growth factors, where lower concentrations result in lower proliferative capacities [107]. As expected, the results here are opposite to those seen in Figure 2, with the distribution now shifting to a higher concentration in the cell population relative to the single-cell distribution [97].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In a previous contribution, we investigated dilution-based negative feedback [97], where increasing concentration increases the cellular growth (dilution) rate. This would be the case for many cellular growth factors, where lower concentrations result in lower proliferative capacities [107]. As expected, the results here are opposite to those seen in Figure 2, with the distribution now shifting to a higher concentration in the cell population relative to the single-cell distribution [97].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%