2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0373463307004286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-GPS Navigation for Security Personnel and First Responders

Abstract: This paper introduces a “Personal Dead-reckoning” (PDR) navigation system for walking persons. The system is useful for monitoring the position of emergency responders inside buildings, where GPS is unavailable. The PDR system uses a six-axes Inertial Measurement Unit attached to the user's boot. The system's strength lies in the use of a technique known as Zero Velocity Update (ZUPT) that virtually eliminates the ill-effects of drift in the accelerometers. It works very well with different gaits, as well as o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
216
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
216
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Skog et al (2010) developed a novel stance hypothesis optimal detector; however this is restricted to 2D cases. Ojeda and Borenstein (2007) implemented two empiric rules for gyro signals analysis to detect zero velocity. The system was tested with a variety of walking patterns, on stairs and on rugged terrain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skog et al (2010) developed a novel stance hypothesis optimal detector; however this is restricted to 2D cases. Ojeda and Borenstein (2007) implemented two empiric rules for gyro signals analysis to detect zero velocity. The system was tested with a variety of walking patterns, on stairs and on rugged terrain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step length is time-varying, and can be estimated online using its linear relationship with step frequency [7], while the heading is obtained from the data measured by gyroscope or magnetometer. The accuracy of navigation system based on PDR alone can be as low as 2%-10%, where acceleration can be measured on the torso, waist, foot and head [8][9][10][11]; however the error may grow quickly due to the inherent instrumental error, disturbances from the environment and unsteady walking, in addition to error of step length calculation and increment of the heading error as a non-observable state [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods are based on step counters and estimate the distance covered using an average step length [1], [2], [3]. Other methods are based on doubly integrating the acceleration measurements during the walking movement [4], [5], [6]. Yet others try to determine the direction in which the pedestrian is walking to estimate a trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%