2009
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqp096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and occupational radiation exposure assessed using local data

Abstract: The application of an Australian JEM did not provide evidence for an association between NHL and occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and is consistent with previous analyses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the questionnaire used to collect sun exposure data was validated, internationally used and detailed 24,5052. The weaknesses are that only one facial site was investigated and the use of sunglasses and eyeglasses was not recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the questionnaire used to collect sun exposure data was validated, internationally used and detailed 24,5052. The weaknesses are that only one facial site was investigated and the use of sunglasses and eyeglasses was not recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial questionnaire (including a residence calendar) was completed by the participants, at home, and mailed to the interviewer, and more detailed sun exposure data were subsequently collected by telephone based upon the residence calendar as described by Armstrong (20). Comprehensive calendar data on self-reported weekday and weekend sun exposure habits throughout life were collected, as were details about latitude of residence and sun exposure habits during vacations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have carried out a large case-control study using a very detailed sun exposure questionnaire (10) in order to better understand the complexities of the relationship between sun exposure and melanoma risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%