2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5109618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-integrable dimer models: Universality and scaling relations

Abstract: In the last few years, the methods of constructive Fermionic Renormalization Group have been successfully applied to the study of the scaling limit of several two-dimensional statistical mechanics models at the critical point, including: weakly non-integrable 2D Ising models, Ashkin-Teller, 8-Vertex, and close-packed interacting dimer models. In this note, we focus on the illustrative example of the interacting dimer model and review some of the universality results derived in this context. In particular, we d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, letting x = (x 1 , x 2 ), Even if not indicated explicitly, the functions ν, α ω , β ω , K ω,j, , H ω,j, , p ω all depend non-trivially on the edge weights {t e }. In particular, generically, ν = 1 + c 1 λ + O(λ 2 ), with c 1 a non zero coefficient, which depends upon the edge weights (this was already observed in [26] for interacting dimers on planar graphs); therefore, generically, ν is larger or smaller than 1, depending on the sign of λ.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, letting x = (x 1 , x 2 ), Even if not indicated explicitly, the functions ν, α ω , β ω , K ω,j, , H ω,j, , p ω all depend non-trivially on the edge weights {t e }. In particular, generically, ν = 1 + c 1 λ + O(λ 2 ), with c 1 a non zero coefficient, which depends upon the edge weights (this was already observed in [26] for interacting dimers on planar graphs); therefore, generically, ν is larger or smaller than 1, depending on the sign of λ.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a previous series of works [24,25,26,27], in collaboration with V. Mastropietro, we started developing methods for the treatment of interacting, non-solvable, dimer models via constructive, fermionic, Renormalization Group (RG) techniques. We exhibited an explicit class of models, which include the 6-vertex model close to its free Fermi point as well as several non-integrable versions thereof, for which we proved the GFF nature of the scaling limit of the height fluctuations, as well as the validity of a 'Kadanoff' or 'Haldane' scaling relation connecting the critical exponent of the so-called electric correlator with the one of the dimer-dimer correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not true any more for the interacting model. Indeed, an explicit calculation of ν at first order in λ for the model with plaquette interaction shows a non-trivial dependence both on λ and on the weights [27].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the non-oscillatory term. Let us remark that an explicit computation [51] shows that, generically, not only ν ′ (0) is different from zero, but it also depends explicitly upon the average slope ρ j = ρ j (t 1 , t 2 , t 3 , λ) = e∈C η→η+aê j σ e (lim L→∞ E λ a,Ω (1 e ) − 1/4). Once that the sharp asymptotics for the two-point dimer correlation is know, we can compute the variance of height fluctuations, in analogy with (3.14) then we plug the asymptotics (3.17) in the right side of this equation, and by choosing the paths C ηx 1 →ηx 2 , C ηx 3 →ηx 4 well separated, we find that the contributions to the variance from the second and third terms in the right side of (3.17) vanish as a → 0.…”
Section: Interacting Dimer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%