Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2005.1415066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Intrusive GMM-Based Speech Quality Measurement

Abstract: We propose a non-intrusive speech quality measurement algorithm based on using Gaussian-mixture probability models of features of undegraded speech signals as an artificial reference model of "clean" speech behaviour. The consistency between the features of the test speech signal and the reference model serves as an indicator of speech quality. Consistency measures are calculated and mapped to an objective speech quality score using a multivariate adaptive regression splines function. Simulation results show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter models the normative behavior of clean speech. Previous research [8] has shown that clean speech models are useful for measuring the quality of speech degraded by conditions unseen to the algorithm, e.g., noise-corrupted speech. The parameters for the 15 models are stored in a lookup table and are used in KLD calculation, as described in Section 3.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Reference Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter models the normative behavior of clean speech. Previous research [8] has shown that clean speech models are useful for measuring the quality of speech degraded by conditions unseen to the algorithm, e.g., noise-corrupted speech. The parameters for the 15 models are stored in a lookup table and are used in KLD calculation, as described in Section 3.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Reference Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize the algorithm's enhanced performance by comparing results for the SMV-2 database. In [1], P.563 outperformed the GMMbased algorithm by 13% in R and 6% in . Degradation conditions in SMV-2 encompass frame errors with 1, 3, or 5% frame error rates.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the simplifying assumption has been shown in [8] to provide accurate speech quality estimates. Thus, for a given speech signal, the consistency between the observation and the models can be defined as (1) where x = x 1 , . .…”
Section: Gm Reference Models and Consistency Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations