2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.975037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive brain-spine interface: Continuous control of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation using EEG

Abstract: Brain-controlled neuromodulation has emerged as a promising tool to promote functional recovery in patients with motor disorders. Brain-machine interfaces exploit this neuromodulatory strategy and could be used for restoring voluntary control of lower limbs. In this work, we propose a non-invasive brain-spine interface (BSI) that processes electroencephalographic (EEG) activity to volitionally control trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (ts-MS), as an approach for lower-limb neurorehabilitation. This novel platf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diverse array of open-loop approaches, such as non-invasive [ 117 ] and invasive [ 118 ] brain stimulation, somatosensory nerve stimulation [ 119 ], vagus nerve stimulation [ 120 ], plus closed-loop neural interfacing approaches [ 121 ] have been applied. In the latter, peripheral electrical stimulation has been tailored to deliver closed-loop contingent excitation of neural networks, thus enhancing activity-dependent plasticity [ 122 , 123 , 124 ] producing promising results [ 125 ]. Recent efforts have further explored the relationship between the phase of neural oscillation (e.g., sensorimotor rhythms) and higher excitatory states [ 126 , 127 ].…”
Section: Challenges and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diverse array of open-loop approaches, such as non-invasive [ 117 ] and invasive [ 118 ] brain stimulation, somatosensory nerve stimulation [ 119 ], vagus nerve stimulation [ 120 ], plus closed-loop neural interfacing approaches [ 121 ] have been applied. In the latter, peripheral electrical stimulation has been tailored to deliver closed-loop contingent excitation of neural networks, thus enhancing activity-dependent plasticity [ 122 , 123 , 124 ] producing promising results [ 125 ]. Recent efforts have further explored the relationship between the phase of neural oscillation (e.g., sensorimotor rhythms) and higher excitatory states [ 126 , 127 ].…”
Section: Challenges and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most patients who need the BCI rehabilitation system have usually lost the ability to perform active exercise, physiological signals generated by brain activity in the process of AO and MI are increasingly being used as effective control signals, and these signals are likely to be generated by MNS excitement. For example, mu (μ) suppression is an important electrophysiological evidence for the existence of MN, and a large number of BCIs use this EEG signal as a control signal (72). The haptic feedback induced by ES can also evoke SMC brain activations and can be used as control signals in the BCI system (43).…”
Section: Activation Of Brain Areas During Neuromuscular Electrical St...mentioning
confidence: 99%