2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: BackgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of physical, psychological, and cognitive impairment, but many current treatments for TBI are ineffective or produce adverse side effects. Non-invasive methods of brain stimulation could help ameliorate some common trauma-induced symptoms.ObjectiveThis review summarizes instances in which repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have been used to treat symptoms following a TBI. A subsequent di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet many studies are seeking to understand the mechanisms by which different TES techniques can complement an existing cognitive training (Dhaliwal, Meek, & Modirrousta, 2015;Yun, Chun, & Kim, 2015). tES is non-invasive and if used correctly should not lead to any aversive effects, it is relatively cheap and can be implemented in various contexts as an adjunct to existing techniques, which although are effective in isolation, might not be offering the most optimal treatment to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet many studies are seeking to understand the mechanisms by which different TES techniques can complement an existing cognitive training (Dhaliwal, Meek, & Modirrousta, 2015;Yun, Chun, & Kim, 2015). tES is non-invasive and if used correctly should not lead to any aversive effects, it is relatively cheap and can be implemented in various contexts as an adjunct to existing techniques, which although are effective in isolation, might not be offering the most optimal treatment to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhaliwal et al (2015) and Li et al (2015) have both recently reviewed the potential use of brain stimulation in TBI survivors. While most of the studies they review focus on non-motor impairments, they directly speak to the relative safety and potential benefit of brain stimulation in TBI individuals.…”
Section: Transcranial Cortical Stimulation Following Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the studies they review focus on non-motor impairments, they directly speak to the relative safety and potential benefit of brain stimulation in TBI individuals. Several studies demonstrate that rTMS and tDCS can reduce TBI related depression, tinnitus, neglect, and memory and attention disorders (see review: (Dhaliwal et al, 2015; Li et al, 2015)). Middleton et al (2014) also report that bi-hemispheric tDCS in two TBI survivors (one individual had a stroke and TBI) improved upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scores for up to 6 months post-treatment (Middleton et al, 2014).…”
Section: Transcranial Cortical Stimulation Following Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,81 The annual incidence of TBI in the US is approximately 1.5 million. Initial damage occurs due to direct physical damage to the brain, with further damage occurring due to secondary processes such as glutaminergic excitotoxicity, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and increased intracranial pressure.…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%