S equence analysis of glioblastoma found a mutation in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), which mostly resulted in the replacement of wild-type arginine in position 132 with histidine (R132H). 25 Studies have reported that the IDH1 mutation is frequently detected in diffuse astrocytoma (59%-88%), anaplastic astrocytoma (52%-78%), oligodendroglioma (68%-82%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (60%-75%), oligoastrocytoma (50%-94%), anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (66.1%-78%), and secondary glioblastomas (50%-88%), but rarely in primary glioblastomas (3%-7%).1,14 IDH1 mutation was also closely associated with young age and better clinical outcome. 34 Currently, the detection of IDH1 mutation status can be achieved by DNA-based methods, such as DNA pyrosequencing, 10 polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 13,24 and immunohistochemistry (IHC). 5 The majority of laboratories use IHC for initial screening for IDH1 mutation and, if results are negative, use DNA sequencing for less common IDH1 mutant types. DNA sequencing provides direct abbreviatioNs AUC = area under the curve; FFPE = formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; IDH1 = isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; IHC = immunohistochemistry; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; ROC = receiver operating characteristic. obJective Conventional methods for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) detection, such as DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry, are time- and labor-consuming and cannot be applied for intraoperative analysis. To develop a new approach for rapid analysis of IDH1 mutation from tiny tumor samples, this study used microfluidics as a method for IDH1 mutation detection. methods Forty-seven glioma tumor samples were used; IDH1 mutation status was investigated by immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. The microfluidic device was fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane following standard soft lithography. The immunoanalysis was conducted in the microfluidic chip. Fluorescence images of the on-chip microcolumn taken by the charge-coupled device camera were collected as the analytical results readout. Fluorescence signals were analyzed by NIS-Elements software to gather detailed information about the IDH1 concentration in the tissue samples. results DNA sequencing identified IDH1 R132H mutation in 33 of 47 tumor samples. The fluorescence signal for IDH1-mutant samples was 5.49 ± 1.87 compared with 3.90 ± 1.33 for wild type (p = 0.005). Thus, microfluidics was capable of distinguishing IDH1-mutant tumor samples from wild-type samples. When the cutoff value was 4.11, the sensitivity of microfluidics was 87.9% and the specificity was 64.3%. coNclusioNs This new approach was capable of analyzing IDH1 mutation status of tiny tissue samples within 30 minutes using intraoperative microsampling. This approach might also be applied for rapid pathological diagnosis of diffuse gliomas, thus guiding personalized resection.