2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.656632
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Diagnosis for Acute Rejection Using Urinary mRNA Signature Reflecting Allograft Status in Kidney Transplantation

Abstract: Urine has been regarded as a good resource based on the assumption that urine can directly reflect the state of the allograft or ongoing injury in kidney transplantation. Previous studies, suggesting the usefulness of urinary mRNA as a biomarker of acute rejection, imply that urinary mRNA mirrors the transcriptional activity of the kidneys. We selected 14 data-driven candidate genes through a meta-analysis and measured the candidate genes using quantitative PCR without pre-amplification in the cross-sectional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Majority of the studies that have investigated biomarkers for rejection with respect to kidney transplantation have used different threshold values for the discovery and validation stages, thereby limiting their application in clinical practice ( 54 ). In fact, we have recently demonstrated that fixed cut-off values can be useful in urinary mRNA-based non-invasive diagnosis of AR ( 55 ). Hence, an important consideration of our study is the application of a fixed cut-off value during the assessment of the validation cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of the studies that have investigated biomarkers for rejection with respect to kidney transplantation have used different threshold values for the discovery and validation stages, thereby limiting their application in clinical practice ( 54 ). In fact, we have recently demonstrated that fixed cut-off values can be useful in urinary mRNA-based non-invasive diagnosis of AR ( 55 ). Hence, an important consideration of our study is the application of a fixed cut-off value during the assessment of the validation cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine is a valuable source for identifying relevant biomarkers associated with kidney diseases as it is generated directly from the kidneys and can be collected non-invasively. We have previously demonstrated the utility of urinary mRNAs and proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in various renal conditions such as transplant rejection, primary glomerular diseases, and DKD (18,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Recent (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalization of urinary mRNA expression data is a critical issue in biomarker research; however, optimal normalization strategies for mRNA remain controversial ( 41 ). In this study, we used 18S rRNA rather than urine creatinine for the normalization of urinary mRNAs expression data as we have previously demonstrated this strategy to be useful in identifying urinary mRNA biomarkers ( 22 , 28 ). Further investigations are required to determine whether urine creatinine may be better for normalization of urinary mRNA expression data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These probes then facilitate surface immobilisation, and the output is quantified using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. A recent study by Seo et al [24] used a combination of online meta-analysis, nCounter-based detection and RT-qPCR of urinary exosomal miRNAs to identify novel biomarkers of acute rejection following kidney transplant, in which screening highlighted upregulated miR-21, miR-31, miR-155, miR-210, miR-223-3, miR-373 and downregulation of miR-4488 and miR-4532.…”
Section: Biomarker Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%