The recent article of Spadea et al. 1,2 and Toker et al. 3 evaluated the efficacy of accelerated corneal crosslinking (AXL) under different treatment protocols, and the relationship between CXL efficacy and the demarcation line (DL) depth based on available measured data. 1,2 The sudden-drop of DL depth at high intensity (>45 mW/cm 2) has the similar feature as the AXL efficacy reported by Wernli et al. 4 However, it is clinically unclear whether DL depth is proportional to the crosslink depth or the CXL efficacy. 1-3 Moreover, controversial results of AXL efficacy were reported due to inconsistent protocols which were not optimized. To improve the efficacy of AXL, Lin proposed a new protocol called riboflavin (Rf) concentration-controlled method (CCM), 5 in which extra Rf drops are applied to the cornea, at every crosslink time (T*), during the UV exposure, having a frequency defined as Fdrop ¼ N-1, with N ¼ 0.365 [I 0 /C 0 ] 0.5. This formula provides the optimal protocol that higher intensity (I 0) and/or lower Rf concentration (C 0) requires larger Fdrop to compensate its faster Rf depletion, and lower steady-state efficacy, comparing to the low-intensity Dresden protocol. This correspondence intends to further analyze the clinically measured DL depth via the key influencing factors of CXL, including Rf concentration profile (pre-and intraoperatively), 6 Rf initial diffusion depth, UV light effective dose, epithelial absorption (for epi-on case), and most importantly, the administration protocols of Rf during CXL, governed by Fdrop and the waiting period after each Rf drop. 5 The measured DLdepth of various protocols will be analyzed and compared to a combined-efficacy formula. 5,7 The measured DL depth may be compared to a combined type-I CXL efficacy given by 5-7 c-Ceff ¼ 1-exp (-4R), with R ¼ (62/t') [C 0 F(z)/I 0 3 ] 0.5 , where F(z) ¼ 1-0.5z/D, is the Rf initial concentration profile defined by a diffusion depth (D); and the resupply Rf drops every t'minutes. R is the efficacy ratio between the noncontrolled Dresden protocol and the optimal protocol (via CCM) having R ¼ 1.0, and c-Ceff ¼ 0.98, for all range of UV intensity I 0 ¼ 3 to 60 mW/ cm 2 .