2015
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders: an optimized protocol using MEMO qPCR with miniSTR as internal control

Abstract: This new non-invasive prenatal diagnosis test offers numerous advantages over current methods: it is simple, cost effective, time efficient and does not require complex equipment or bioinformatics settings. Moreover, our assays for different private mutations demonstrate the viability of this approach in clinical settings for monogenic disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous studies dealing with foetal cfDNA detection and qualitative analysis were mostly based on quantitative PCR 22,[25][26][27] . The hypermethylated RASSF1 sequences were reported as a universal marker for the foetal cfDNA detection and quantification 22 but the authors were not able to detect the foetal fraction in four out of nineteen RhD negative pregnant patients using this methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies dealing with foetal cfDNA detection and qualitative analysis were mostly based on quantitative PCR 22,[25][26][27] . The hypermethylated RASSF1 sequences were reported as a universal marker for the foetal cfDNA detection and quantification 22 but the authors were not able to detect the foetal fraction in four out of nineteen RhD negative pregnant patients using this methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies were performed on small sample groups and on targeted mutation of the CFTR gene [7,9,10,[16][17][18][19][20]. In contrast, here we analyzed more than 14 samples from high-risk CF pregnancies and over 16 samples from pregnancies with a priori CF risk based on ultrasound findings, the latter secondarily excluded following parental genotyping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…material) in K3 EDTA Vacutainer tubes or cell-stabilizing tubes (Streck blood collection tube [BCT]). Samples were processed up to 24 h (EDTA tubes) or up to 72 h (BCT) after sampling as previously described [9,10].…”
Section: Participants and Processing Of Blood Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various high-throughput technologies have been explored to detect paternal cystic fibrosis alleles in cffDNA, such as sequencing [ 3 ], microarrays [ 4 ] and conventional fluorescence quantitative PCR [ 5 ]. We propose that ddPCR is a technically unchallenging, flexible and cost-effective addition to the range of tools available for analysing NIPD samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal challenge of NIPD is that cffDNA makes up only a small proportion of total free circulating DNA (generally less than 10% [ 1 ],[ 2 ]), especially at earlier stages of pregnancy, therefore high-sensitivity technology such as next-generation sequencing [ 3 ], microarrays [ 4 ] or quantitative PCR [ 5 ] is required to accurately detect it. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly sensitive and quantitative alternative to conventional qPCR which is based on the nanofluidic partitioning of DNA molecules between many small wells following a high degree of sample dilution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%