2019
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2019-0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies

Abstract: The last decade has seen incredible advances in the genetic era, in next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA in the maternal plasma, detecting abnormal fetal chromosomes. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has showed increased sensitivity and specificity for Down syndrome superior to any other screening test. Technical advances have made possible the detection of other conditions which does not necessarily mean clinical benefit for the patient. Private laboratories have added multiple conditions in the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As nearly all genetic abnormalities were identified correctly, high sensitivity and specificity was observed for our simulated samples. Although different sensitivities were reported when detecting genetic abnormalities at different levels 31 , the sensitivity for our reported approach should not varied much, as all relative allelic information were encoded in amplified amplicons for each polymorphic site and different alleles of each amplicon had nearly identical sequences with similar amplification properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As nearly all genetic abnormalities were identified correctly, high sensitivity and specificity was observed for our simulated samples. Although different sensitivities were reported when detecting genetic abnormalities at different levels 31 , the sensitivity for our reported approach should not varied much, as all relative allelic information were encoded in amplified amplicons for each polymorphic site and different alleles of each amplicon had nearly identical sequences with similar amplification properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we reported a method enabling the detection of genetic abnormalities simultaneously at different genetic levels through amplicon sequencing of specific polymorphic targets. Although different sensitivities were reported when detecting genetic abnormalities at different levels 31 , the sensitivity for our reported approach should not varied much, as all relative allelic information were encoded in amplified amplicons for each polymorphic site and different alleles of each amplicon had nearly identical sequences with similar amplification properties. In clinical settings, accuracy, specificity and sensitivity should be addressed using real cfDNA samples, as clinical data was inherently noisy and discrepancies between the genotypes of maternal plasma fetal DNA and the fetal genomes were reported in some samples possibly due to confined placental mosaicism 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important clue, particularly when the paradigm of first-trimester screening is shifted toward cf DNA. In some countries, a first-trimester ultrasound scan is no longer part of the screening protocol [20][21][22][23]. Cf DNA screening without ultrasound will miss cases with increased NT, which is a valuable tool even in cases without apparent anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a non-invasive, relatively painless, and safe procedure with no risk of miscarriage which is usually associated with other prenatal procedures, as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS). NIPT has a higher sensitivity and specificity and more effective overall in detecting common aneuploidies (up to 99%), when compared with traditional prenatal screening, that is not more than 96% in countries with well-organized health systems, but usually stays about 85-90% [8,9]. *IPD is obligatory for high-risk group of pregnant women and is optional for intermediate-risk group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%