2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Preoperative Imaging Differential Diagnosis of Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma and Angiomatous Meningioma: A Novel Developed and Validated Multiparametric MRI-Based Clini-Radiomic Model

Abstract: BackgroundAccurate preoperative differentiation of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma can greatly assist operation plan making and prognosis prediction. In this study, a clini-radiomic model combining radiomic and clinical features was used to distinguish intracranial hemangiopericytoma and hemangioma meningioma preoperatively.MethodsA total of 147 patients with intracranial hemangiopericytoma and 73 patients with angiomatous meningioma from the Tiantan Hospital were retrospectively rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the association between radiomics features and differentiation of intracranial SFTs and ATMs has not been evaluated. However, previous studies have applied the radiomics models based on T1WI or T2WI to distinguish between SFTs and meningiomas, especially angiomatous meningiomas, achieved AUCs ranging from 0.762 to 0.918 [20,21,30]. In our sample cohort, we applied the LR method to construct three radiomics models (T1WI, T2WI, and T1&T2WI joint models)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, the association between radiomics features and differentiation of intracranial SFTs and ATMs has not been evaluated. However, previous studies have applied the radiomics models based on T1WI or T2WI to distinguish between SFTs and meningiomas, especially angiomatous meningiomas, achieved AUCs ranging from 0.762 to 0.918 [20,21,30]. In our sample cohort, we applied the LR method to construct three radiomics models (T1WI, T2WI, and T1&T2WI joint models)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, radiomics analysis has been proven to provide valuable information to re ect the underlying pathophysiology, which is hard to acquire by visual interpretation [18]. Previous studies have illustrated that radiomics features from cMRI have powerful performance in the discrimination of intracranial SFTs and meningiomas, especially for angiomatous meningiomas [19][20][21]. However, it remains unclear whether signal intensity or radiomics features from cMRI are applicable to differentiate intracranial SFTs and ATMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, SFT/HPC have shown higher apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values than meningiomas [ 26 ]. In recent years, machine learning–based radiomics analysis, combining MRI-based radiomic features and clinical findings, has been proposed as a viable tool to make a differential diagnosis of HPC and meningioma with high accuracy [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool demonstrated a remarkable diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.917 in the validation cohort. Finally, Fan et al [ 9 ] developed a diagnostic model based on a combination of clinical and radiomics features to distinguish the two neoplasms, reporting an AUC of 0.91 in the validation set.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%