2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0T MR imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies using MRI were not calibrated through comparison with a phantom, and less reproducibility was obtained than with the technique described here [19][20][21][22][23]. In contrast with these previous studies, we compared MRI findings with optical image analysis data using software and found that measurements from the two modalities were linearly related and highly correlated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many previous studies using MRI were not calibrated through comparison with a phantom, and less reproducibility was obtained than with the technique described here [19][20][21][22][23]. In contrast with these previous studies, we compared MRI findings with optical image analysis data using software and found that measurements from the two modalities were linearly related and highly correlated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, this preparation is the only indispensable step for accurate quantification. Recent studies have demonstrated that a technique using selective saturation with a 3.0-T MRI scanner quantified liver fat content relatively well [21,33], but 3.0-T MRI scanners are not commonly available at present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the modified Dixon method, it is possible to detect mild liver steatosis using dual-echo fast GRE sequence imaging (4,(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca bu çalışma göstermiştir ki, US ile MR arasındaki bu uyum yağlanma yokluğunda da yüksektir. Bizim çalışmamızda MRG sinyal şiddeti ile ölçülen doku yağ oranı için kullandığımız eşik değer %5.1 olup değişik çalışmalarda %5, %5.1, %5.56, %8, %17 gibi farklı eşik değerler biyopsi ve MRS ile karşılaştırılmış ve iyi korelasyon göstermiştir [9,13,18,19]. Yine de yağlanmanın MR derecesi ile US derecesi arasında birebir denklik olmaması beklenti dahilindedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified