2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive single-trial detection of variable population spike responses in human somatosensory evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of cortical population spiking activity evoked by median nerve stimulation was estimated as "signal-plus-noise"to-noise ratio (SNNR: ratio of signal-plus-noise amplitudes in a response window to noise-only amplitudes in a prestimulus window): Phase-insensitive hfSER components had a single-trial SNNR between 5.6 dB (subject S4) and 8.8 dB (subject S1). The SNNR in the present ultralow-noise single-channel MEG recordings was therefore mostly higher than in optimally projected low-noise multichannel scalp-EEG recordings: In previous eight-channel EEG data, 9 of 10 subjects had a SNNR of hfSERs below 5.1 dB (26). Critically, the SNNR of phase-insensitive hfSER components is not obtained from a standard average across responses (as in, e.g., ref.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase of cortical population spiking activity evoked by median nerve stimulation was estimated as "signal-plus-noise"to-noise ratio (SNNR: ratio of signal-plus-noise amplitudes in a response window to noise-only amplitudes in a prestimulus window): Phase-insensitive hfSER components had a single-trial SNNR between 5.6 dB (subject S4) and 8.8 dB (subject S1). The SNNR in the present ultralow-noise single-channel MEG recordings was therefore mostly higher than in optimally projected low-noise multichannel scalp-EEG recordings: In previous eight-channel EEG data, 9 of 10 subjects had a SNNR of hfSERs below 5.1 dB (26). Critically, the SNNR of phase-insensitive hfSER components is not obtained from a standard average across responses (as in, e.g., ref.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 64%
“…even at the level of unaveraged single trials tainted by system noise (which, however, is exceptionally low for the present ultralownoise MEG system). Corroborating previous human scalp-EEG recordings (24,26), this detection of evoked ("added") hf-energy excludes a mere stimulus-driven phase reset of ongoing background HFO as sole generator of macroscopic hfSERs (25). The increase of cortical population spiking activity evoked by median nerve stimulation was estimated as "signal-plus-noise"to-noise ratio (SNNR: ratio of signal-plus-noise amplitudes in a response window to noise-only amplitudes in a prestimulus window): Phase-insensitive hfSER components had a single-trial SNNR between 5.6 dB (subject S4) and 8.8 dB (subject S1).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain oscillatory networks in 'classical' frequency bands (from 1 Hz up to 120 Hz) could also be contaminated by the band-pass filtering of transients, requiring an adequate pipeline for separation (Selesnick and Bayram 2009). High frequency oscillations (HFO, between 120Hz and 500 Hz) in the ripple and fast ripples bands (Urrestarazu et al 2006;Chaibi et al 2014) as well as physiological oscillations (Bragin et al 2010;Waterstraat et al 2016) Despiking could potentially be useful for other fields of neuroscience, where mixtures of transients and oscillations are present in the time series. For example, local field potentials present a mixture of oscillatory activity and sharp action potentials, and despiking could improve the investigation of correlations between LFP frequency bands and neuronal spiking (Mazzoni et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain oscillatory networks in 'classical' frequency bands (from 1 Hz up to 120 Hz) could also be contaminated by the band-pass filtering of transients, requiring an adequate pipeline for separation (Selesnick and Bayram 2009). High frequency oscillations (HFO, between 120 Hz and 500 Hz) in the ripple and fast ripples bands (Urrestarazu et al 2006, Chaibi et al 2014 as well as physiological oscillations (Bragin et al 2010, Waterstraat et al 2016 could also benefit from such separation technique (see supplementary figure 2 for a preliminary test in the HFO frequency band).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our present data, these cortical HFO were followed by spike suppression and noticeable after hyperpolarisation. HFO were also identified by FFT analyses of somatosensory evoked potentials in humans (Curio et al, 1994;Waterstraat et al, 2016).…”
Section: Other Hfo Already Describedmentioning
confidence: 99%