2012
DOI: 10.14314/polimery.2012.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal crystallization of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/single-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites

Abstract: Non-isothermal crystallization of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/ single-walled carbon nanotubes nanocompositesSummary -In this work, non-isothermal crystallization behavior of nanocomposites based on poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and neat PTT was studied in order to determine the effects of SWCNTs on its crystallization behavior. Nanocomposites with 0.3 and 0.5 wt. % of SWCNTs were studied. Using of SAXS and DSC methods, the nanostructure of PTT/SWCNTs na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 summarizes the results of the nanostructure studies during melt crystallization of neat PET and nanocomposite with loading of 0.5 wt% of GO. These data indicate that the average values of lamellar thickness accompanied by the decrease of the amorphous layer decreases with decreasing temperature and consistent with previous data for other crystalline polymers and their nanocomposites [57][58][59]. The observed in the higher-temperature region sharp decrease of the average value of could be connected with the sequential formation of either new crystal lamellae or lamellar stacks or both in the interlamellar amorphous regions [58,59].…”
Section: Effect Of Go On Crystallization Of Pet Nanocompositessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 6 summarizes the results of the nanostructure studies during melt crystallization of neat PET and nanocomposite with loading of 0.5 wt% of GO. These data indicate that the average values of lamellar thickness accompanied by the decrease of the amorphous layer decreases with decreasing temperature and consistent with previous data for other crystalline polymers and their nanocomposites [57][58][59]. The observed in the higher-temperature region sharp decrease of the average value of could be connected with the sequential formation of either new crystal lamellae or lamellar stacks or both in the interlamellar amorphous regions [58,59].…”
Section: Effect Of Go On Crystallization Of Pet Nanocompositessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The cold crystallization onset temperatures of PEE þ 1%CNF and PEE þ 1%GNP have the lowest values, which vary from the cold crystallization onset temperatures for PEE by 6 and 4 °C, respectively. Furthermore, these nanocomposites exhibit a double exothermic peak during cold crystallization, probably caused by the saturation of nucleation efficiency at low nanofiller concentration; a similar effect was observed by Szymczyk et al [25] The value of T m does not differ significantly among synthesized materials. Moreover, the melting enthalpy (ΔH m ) was used for the calculation of the degree of crystallinity (X c ) using Equation (3)…”
Section: Morphology and Structuresupporting
confidence: 78%
“…While, WAXS diffractograms of semicrystalline PTT‐based nanocomposites (Fig. b) show characteristic diffraction peaks of PTT and INT‐WS 2 demonstrating that the nanofillers do not influence the crystal structure of PTT. Similar observations were made for nanocomposites based on different polymer matrices with MWCNT and INT‐WS 2 …”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%