2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal phase-transformation kinetics model for evaluating the austenization of 55CrMo steel based on Johnson–Mehl–Avrami equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were rare studies on large section forging steel with the diameter larger than 250 mm and the air cooling rate below 0.05ºC/s. Austenite formation in low carbon steels has been studied extensively in the literature starting from different microstructures [4][5][6]. Previous work has shown that in ferritic-pearlitic microstructures the formation of austenite was described as taking place in three main successive steps: (1) nucleation of austenite in pearlite colonies, ferrite-pearlite grain boundaries or ferrite-ferrite grain boundaries, (2) rapid growth of austenite consuming pearlite, (3) slower growth of austenite consuming ferrite [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were rare studies on large section forging steel with the diameter larger than 250 mm and the air cooling rate below 0.05ºC/s. Austenite formation in low carbon steels has been studied extensively in the literature starting from different microstructures [4][5][6]. Previous work has shown that in ferritic-pearlitic microstructures the formation of austenite was described as taking place in three main successive steps: (1) nucleation of austenite in pearlite colonies, ferrite-pearlite grain boundaries or ferrite-ferrite grain boundaries, (2) rapid growth of austenite consuming pearlite, (3) slower growth of austenite consuming ferrite [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As curvas dilatométricas obtidas durante o resfriamento, além de fornecer as temperaturas críticas Ar3 e Ar1 medidas experimentalmente, também foram utilizadas para estudo da cinética de formação da ferrita a partir de diferentes taxas de resfriamento contínuo considerando a adaptação do modelo clássico JMAK. Assim, as frações de austenita e de ferrita obtidas durante o resfriamento de cada uma das amostras dos diferentes aços IF foram determinadas pela regra da alavanca [16,17] durante toda a transformação e, posteriormente os gráficos de fração de austenita e de ferrita em função do tempo foram construídos. Em cada gráfico fração em função do tempo, foi realizado o ajuste considerando o modelo JMAK (Equação 1), que por sua vez permitiu a determinação de constantes que serviram como parâmetros de entrada para uma posterior simulação da cinética de formação da ferrita.…”
Section: Caracterização Da Cinética De Transformação De Fasesunclassified
“…Fig. 13 Microstructures of samples at the cooling rate of 20°C/s: a un-deformed sample; b sample subjected to 10% deformation degree; c sample subjected to 20% deformation degree; d sample subjected to 30% deformation degree; e sample subjected to 40% deformation degree The relationship between the relative volume changes DV=V 0 and the relative length Dl=l 0 can be expressed as follows [27]…”
Section: Volume Fraction Of Phase Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%