2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal thermo-kinetics and empirical modeling: Comparative pyrolysis of cow and Buffalo manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the Ea for feeds DP, CW, and CD vary from 166.04 to 207.48, 118.09 to 293.50, and 168.50 to 273.39 kJ/ mol using the FWO model (figure S2). However, a slightly lower Ea has been previously reported for cow manure, buffalo manure, and CD compared to our results using model-free methods [43,44] and model-based methods [41]. On the other hand, Ea for DP has been reported as high as 324 kJ/mol by Parthasarathy et al [45], which is much higher than the 207 kJ/mol reported in this study.…”
Section: 4contrasting
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, the Ea for feeds DP, CW, and CD vary from 166.04 to 207.48, 118.09 to 293.50, and 168.50 to 273.39 kJ/ mol using the FWO model (figure S2). However, a slightly lower Ea has been previously reported for cow manure, buffalo manure, and CD compared to our results using model-free methods [43,44] and model-based methods [41]. On the other hand, Ea for DP has been reported as high as 324 kJ/mol by Parthasarathy et al [45], which is much higher than the 207 kJ/mol reported in this study.…”
Section: 4contrasting
confidence: 88%