2023
DOI: 10.18280/mmep.100236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Leaner Control on the Pneumatic Artificial Muscles: A Comparative Study Between Adaptive Backstepping and Conventional Backstepping Algorithms

Abstract: This paper focuses on the control of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles (PAMs) used in arm manipulator modeling and the dynamic model of the Pneumatic Artificial Muscles. PAMs have become popular in robotics due to their fast work capabilities, direct action mechanisms, and safety implementation. However, these systems often suffer from uncertainty, nonlinearity, and time-varying features, which negatively impact tracking control performance and cause instability in motion outcomes. To address these issues, this stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further advancements can be explored by suggesting other control techniques, such as adaptive control schemes, observe-based control, backstepping-based control, and active disturbance rejection control for the sake of comparison [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Also, an improvement of the proposed controller can be presented by suggesting modern optimization techniques to optimize the design parameters of the controller [52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further advancements can be explored by suggesting other control techniques, such as adaptive control schemes, observe-based control, backstepping-based control, and active disturbance rejection control for the sake of comparison [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Also, an improvement of the proposed controller can be presented by suggesting modern optimization techniques to optimize the design parameters of the controller [52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%