2013
DOI: 10.1002/navi.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Line-of-Sight Identification for Indoor Positioning Using Ultra-WideBand Radio Signals

Abstract: In this paper, Non‐Line‐of‐Sight (NLoS) identification/mitigation is proposed, based on systematic statistical hypothesis testing. In the proposed method, the combined statistics of timing‐based measurements and Received‐Signal‐Strength (RSS) are used, and the fact that all collected measurements are related to the same unknown position is exploited. Four implementations are proposed, ranging from the rigorous optimal approach to a much simplified and approximate approach, offering a trade‐off between performa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marano et al (2010) and (Wymeersch et al 2012) propose machine learning based methods to classify received signals into LOS and NLOS signals. NLOS detection method based on statistical hypothesis testing are proposed in Yan et al 2013) where both time-and received signal strength-based UWB signal measurements are used. While some of the above approaches provide quite accurate identification, but a full channel impulse response is required in almost all of the methods which is inconvenient for real-time positioning based on simple mobile devices.…”
Section: Uwb Signal Ranging Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marano et al (2010) and (Wymeersch et al 2012) propose machine learning based methods to classify received signals into LOS and NLOS signals. NLOS detection method based on statistical hypothesis testing are proposed in Yan et al 2013) where both time-and received signal strength-based UWB signal measurements are used. While some of the above approaches provide quite accurate identification, but a full channel impulse response is required in almost all of the methods which is inconvenient for real-time positioning based on simple mobile devices.…”
Section: Uwb Signal Ranging Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranging accuracy is degraded in NLOS signals due to the change in their physical signal characteristics. Therefore identifying and mitigating NLOS signals has been looked into widely for high accuracy indoor positioning and ranging (Casas et al 2006;Benedetto and Giunta 2007;Ismail et al 2008;Alsindi et al 2009;Marano et al 2010;Montorsi, Pancaldi, and Vitetta 2011;Wymeersch et al 2012;Yan et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the necessity of indoor positioning has emerged, various positioning methods have been proposed, such as wireless local area network‐based or WIFI‐based (Landa et al., 2019; Mazuelas et al., 2009; Syed & Arslan, 2011), ultra‐wideband‐based (Kok et al., 2015; Pagès & Vilà‐Valls, 2019; Yan et al., 2013), radio‐frequency identification‐based (Saab & Nakad, 2011; Tang & Kim, 2010), Bluetooth‐based (Ai et al., 2019), and long‐term evolution‐based (Abdallah et al., 2019; Shin et al., 2019) algorithms. Each of these algorithms has pros and cons (Mautz, 2012), and a suitable method may vary depending on the indoor environment and the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NLOS identification, the goal is to detect the existence of a NLOS condition between a transmitter and a receiver [ 29 ]. It can be performed by analyzing the received signals, or analyzing the variance of range estimates from a single source [ 30 , 31 ]. In NLOS mitigation, the goal is to reduce the effect of the ranging errors in NLOS conditions [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%