2015 Power Generation System and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pgsret.2015.7312232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear analytic approaches of power flow analysis and voltage profile improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal placement of FACTS devices is a common yet important research topic in literature and has been investigated via various approaches. These include (1) conventional methods (such as indexing [11], controlling [12], residue analysis [13], numerical optimization [14], sensitivity [15], and eigenvalue [16]), (2) optimization methods (such as optimal power flow [17], linear programming [18], dynamic programming [19], mixed integer programming [20], stochastic load flow [21], and adaptive control law [22]), (3) artificial intelligence techniques (such as Monte Carlo simulation [23], artificial bee colony [24], artificial neural network [25], symbiotic organism search algorithm [26], fuzzy systems [27], and particle swarm optimization [28]), (4) hybrid techniques (such as hybrid of bee colony and neural networks [29], hybrid of genetic algorithm and fuzzy systems [30], mixed optimal power flow and particle swarm optimization [31], mixed bee colony and optimal power flow [32], and hybrid of fuzzy systems and Lyapunov theory [33]), and (5) other approaches (such as energy approach [34], active control [35], graph search algorithms [36], whale optimization [37], Gray Wolf optimizer [38], salp swarm optimizer [39], Grasshooper optimization [40], ant lion optimization [41], and spider monkey optimization [42]).…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal placement of FACTS devices is a common yet important research topic in literature and has been investigated via various approaches. These include (1) conventional methods (such as indexing [11], controlling [12], residue analysis [13], numerical optimization [14], sensitivity [15], and eigenvalue [16]), (2) optimization methods (such as optimal power flow [17], linear programming [18], dynamic programming [19], mixed integer programming [20], stochastic load flow [21], and adaptive control law [22]), (3) artificial intelligence techniques (such as Monte Carlo simulation [23], artificial bee colony [24], artificial neural network [25], symbiotic organism search algorithm [26], fuzzy systems [27], and particle swarm optimization [28]), (4) hybrid techniques (such as hybrid of bee colony and neural networks [29], hybrid of genetic algorithm and fuzzy systems [30], mixed optimal power flow and particle swarm optimization [31], mixed bee colony and optimal power flow [32], and hybrid of fuzzy systems and Lyapunov theory [33]), and (5) other approaches (such as energy approach [34], active control [35], graph search algorithms [36], whale optimization [37], Gray Wolf optimizer [38], salp swarm optimizer [39], Grasshooper optimization [40], ant lion optimization [41], and spider monkey optimization [42]).…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], [25], the storage devices operated in a mode of power generation. In [26], a Newton method is used to solve optimal power flow equations. The drawbacks of this method are the output results they obtained are quite near to their limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design of power plant is linked with few analyses without which power plants could not be termed as functional. Among them, the load flow analysis is the key to the acquire steady state of the system [4]- [16]. It is not possible to conduct load flow analysis by handy calculations when the power system is big.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, its convergence rate is faster. Adaptive Newton Raphson is also available but because of zeros in off-diagonal entries, its convergence rate is rapid but its result loses effectivity because of lost or little information [4]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%