Non Linear Electrodynamics Contributing to a Minimum Vacuum Energy (“Cosmological Constant”) Allowed in Early Universe Cosmology

Abstract

This article poses the question of a minimum cosmological constant, i.e. vacuum energy at the start of the cosmological evolution from a near singularity. We pose this comparing formalism as given by Berry (1976) as to a small time length, and compare that in its entirety to compare this value given by Berry (1976) with a minimum time length at the start of cosmological space-time evolution. Using the methodology of Zeldovich (1972) as to a problem with electron-positron pair production we also propose another upper bound to the problem of minimum time length which may be accessible to experimental inquiry. This then makes the problem of minimum time length a way of specifying a magnetic field dependence of the cosmological constant, which has major implications to answering if quintessence, i.e. a changing cosmological vacuum energy, or a constant for the "cosmological constant" problem. Our answer is an initial value for the cosmological vacuum energy 10 10-10 20 times greater than today which suggests either Quintessence, or if still a constant, a much better value for this parameter than what is suggested by traditional field theory methods. In closing we review how our construct supports work done by Corda, as to early universe models and what the implications are, as to the choices we have made.

Does a Randall-Sundrum Brane World Effective Potential Influence Axion Walls Helping to Form a Cosmological Constant Affecting Inflation?

“…While ending our query as to the possible existence of a third polarization we should mention what would be the supreme benefit of our upcoming analysis of Equation (27), namely how to avoid the conflating of dust, with gravitational waves, i.e. the tragic Bicep 2 mistake [10]- [13] End of quote from reference [41] which answers questions as to cosmological questions as to what is necessary for physics interpretation of both bicep 2, and the relative strength of polarization.…”

“…We take the following discussion as quoted directly from [41] namely Quote: from [41] we ask that the readers read this directly from the text, and to fill it in, from there. This section 4, from [41], completely fills in the essential background. [39] is also quoted in the below copy from reference [42].…”

“…[39] is also quoted in the below copy from reference [42]. Keep in mind that the references, as given in the below quote are from [42] and that the reader is urged to this section from [41] directly. Here it is.…”

“…What we are referencing in Equation (12) in the main text is a situation for which there is a pre-Planckian space time for emergent phenomena. The Equation (12) is part of using a publication, [41], which would allow the formation of a graviton, with varying mass, which finally settles upon a rest mass of 10 −62 grams after 10 −62 grams. We pick this procedure as part of our also wanting to know how and why there would be a high degree of flat space, as opposed to curved space, right in the aftermath of Planck time, and an emergent space-time construction would be instrumental in terms of understanding the background as given in publication [41].…”

“…The Equation (12) is part of using a publication, [41], which would allow the formation of a graviton, with varying mass, which finally settles upon a rest mass of 10 −62 grams after 10 −62 grams. We pick this procedure as part of our also wanting to know how and why there would be a high degree of flat space, as opposed to curved space, right in the aftermath of Planck time, and an emergent space-time construction would be instrumental in terms of understanding the background as given in publication [41]. We submit that [41] gives evidence as to the feasibility and importance of Pre-Planckian space time to understand more fully the dynamics of space-time as well as our model of emergence given in Equation (12).…”