2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13380-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…
Figure 3 ( a ) Shows the 2D triangular mesh element with three nodes showing six deformations, 3 in each direction. ( b ) shows the schematic diagram of classical creep 72 .
…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Figure 3 ( a ) Shows the 2D triangular mesh element with three nodes showing six deformations, 3 in each direction. ( b ) shows the schematic diagram of classical creep 72 .
…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the line-search technique and iterative procedures can be found elsewhere. 47,48 Figure 4 shows the comparison between the numerical and experimental load-deflection responses. The peak load obtained by the simulation was 156.6 kN, while the load obtained in test was 148 kN.…”
Section: Post-tensioned Beam Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the Newton–Raphson iterative method is used to solve the non‐linear governing equations. Therefore, Equation is linearized to obtain the tangent stiffness matrix, and consequently, the quadratic convergence in the Newton–Raphson iterative solution can be attained . The Newton equation is written as boldKT,p()boldqnormalΔboldq=boldfextboldfpint(boldq) where K T,p is the tangent matrix, boldfpint is the internal load vector whereas f ext corresponds to the external load vector.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%