2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear flow behaviour of rough fractures having standard JRC profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quadratic coefficient b decreases with the increase of microfracture aperture, whereas there is no obvious correlation between coefficient a and microfracture aperture. A similar experiment by Zoorabadi et al 26 reported that the coefficient b decreased with the increase of fracture aperture, which was consistent with the experimental results.…”
Section: The Variation Of Normal Deformation Of the Microfracture Undsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The quadratic coefficient b decreases with the increase of microfracture aperture, whereas there is no obvious correlation between coefficient a and microfracture aperture. A similar experiment by Zoorabadi et al 26 reported that the coefficient b decreased with the increase of fracture aperture, which was consistent with the experimental results.…”
Section: The Variation Of Normal Deformation Of the Microfracture Undsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Zimmerman et al [16] found the phenomenon of Forchheimer flow in rough fracture when the Reynolds number is bigger than 20 for the first time by means of experiments and numerical method. Zoorabadi et al [17] carried out saturated seepage test on crack specimens with different roughness coefficients JRC and discussed the effects of Reynolds number and relative roughness on nonlinear seepage characteristics. With the rapid development of computer technology, the numerical simulation method has played an important role in considering the geometrical features of fracture surface and studying the seepage of jointed rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometry alterations related to shearing and surface roughness have resulted in an increase in the overall resistance [12]. Several geometric parameters, such as fractal dimensions [18], the high-order statistical parameters of the roughness height [19], the effective slope [20,21], the roughness decomposition [5], and the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) [22], have been used to represent the wall roughness and to better understand the effect of surface roughness on the fracture flow. However, the surface roughness alone is not sufficient to represent the influence of geometry alteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%