2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear model predictive control schemes with application on a 2 link vertical robot manipulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that by using the MPC control approach, the energy consumption is lower than by using the LQ optimal control. Figure 6a,b depict the robot synthetic controls v 2 and v 1 given by Equation (15). As can be seen, the synthetic controls reach zero when the end-effector of the robot reaches its objective.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observed that by using the MPC control approach, the energy consumption is lower than by using the LQ optimal control. Figure 6a,b depict the robot synthetic controls v 2 and v 1 given by Equation (15). As can be seen, the synthetic controls reach zero when the end-effector of the robot reaches its objective.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [15], three nonlinear predictive control approaches for controlling a planar two-link vertical manipulator robot were developed: an adaptive nonlinear model predictive control (nMPC) approach, a proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-based nMPC (PIDnMPC) approach, and a novel simplified nMPC (SnMPC) approach. In [16], a nonlinear model predictive control of a manipulator robot mounted on an unmanned satellite was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mobile Manipulators, planning issues involve Manipulator planning and platform planning in two parts [12,13]. The combination of the platform and the Manipulator makes the system redundant, the same task can be achieved either by a single motion Manipulator or platform, or by moving a Manipulator and a platform at the same time.…”
Section: Mobile Manipulator Movement Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, technological advances in computer systems and sensors has lead in the development and application of advanced control theories and robotics. These advances are presented jointly, since the nonlinear models of robots have served as a good study case in order to illustrate the general concepts of analysis and design of advanced control theories (Canudas de Wit, Siciliano, & Bastin, 1996), for example: adaptive control (Tso & Lin, 1996), sliding modes control (Zhao, Sheng, & Liu, 2014), Lyapunov based control (Halalchi, Bara, & Laroche, 2010), nonlinear predictive control (Wilson, Charest, & Dubay, 2016), fuzzy logic control (Chen, Wang, Zhai, & Gao, 2017), among others. The main reason lies in its ability to manipulate materials, parts, tools or specialized devices by programming their movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%