1989
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90788-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Linear realization of supersymmetry algebra from supersymmetric constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
291
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
291
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Its worldvolume theory includes a Volkov-Akulov fermion goldstino [3,4], which can be equivalently described in terms of a nilpotent scalar superfield S with S 2 (x, θ) = 0 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This nilpotent superfield allows for a manifestly supersymmetric description of the uplift to a de Sitter minimum [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its worldvolume theory includes a Volkov-Akulov fermion goldstino [3,4], which can be equivalently described in terms of a nilpotent scalar superfield S with S 2 (x, θ) = 0 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This nilpotent superfield allows for a manifestly supersymmetric description of the uplift to a de Sitter minimum [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as the nonlinear relation 12) which is similar to Roček's constraint (1.1b). It follows from the definition of Φ, eq.…”
Section: Chiral Scalar Goldstino Superfieldmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As was shown by Roček [6] (see also [11] for a recent review), the Goldstino, which may be identified with D α φ| θ=0 , is the only independent component field contained in φ. In the case of N = 1 supersymmetry, there is an alternative superfield approach to describe the Goldstino dynamics, which was advocated in [12,13]. It consists of getting rid of the nonlinear constraint (1.1b) and working with a chiral scalar X ,DαX = 0, which is only constrained to be nilpotent,…”
Section: Jhep05(2017)061mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations