2016
DOI: 10.3933/applrheol-26-52508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Linear Rheological Properties of Soft Wheat Flour Dough at Different Stages of Farinograph Mixing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6a indicated positive values (> 0) for the magnitudes of e3/e1 for both HRW and SRW wheat flour doughs, suggesting intracycle strain stiffening behavior in the non-linear region at all frequencies studied. Strain stiffening behavior for HRW wheat flour dough (Yazar et al, 2016a) and for SRW wheat flour dough (Yazar et al, 2016b) obtained at different stages of Farinograph mixing were found earlier. At the highest frequency (20 rad/s), as the amplitude of strain increased, a decrease was observed in the magnitude of the strain stiffening behavior of SRW wheat flour dough at a strain amplitude of 70%; while it occurred at around 110% for HRW wheat flour dough (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Laos Parameters For Wheat Flour Doughs As a Function Of Glut...supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Figure 6a indicated positive values (> 0) for the magnitudes of e3/e1 for both HRW and SRW wheat flour doughs, suggesting intracycle strain stiffening behavior in the non-linear region at all frequencies studied. Strain stiffening behavior for HRW wheat flour dough (Yazar et al, 2016a) and for SRW wheat flour dough (Yazar et al, 2016b) obtained at different stages of Farinograph mixing were found earlier. At the highest frequency (20 rad/s), as the amplitude of strain increased, a decrease was observed in the magnitude of the strain stiffening behavior of SRW wheat flour dough at a strain amplitude of 70%; while it occurred at around 110% for HRW wheat flour dough (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Laos Parameters For Wheat Flour Doughs As a Function Of Glut...supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Water absorption is affected by the dough's starch, damaged starch, and protein and pentosan content, and by its gluten network. Freeze-dried ground OP has a softer texture than wheat flour, and this allows the OP particles to hydrate and swell faster than those of the wheat flour, necessitating a smaller percentage of added water in the fortified doughs [44,61]. As reported in Table 3, the added water percentage became lower as the OP inclusion rates rose, starting at 54% for 1% Bosana, and 54.5% for 1% Semidana.…”
Section: Dough Preparation and Breadmaking %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in Table 3, the added water percentage became lower as the OP inclusion rates rose, starting at 54% for 1% Bosana, and 54.5% for 1% Semidana. This may be due to the fact that, although the substituting pomace percentage was low, its presence increased the protein content in the dough, but it was not high enough to decrease the starch content to a point that the presence of both protein and starch required these water absorption percentages [61].…”
Section: Dough Preparation and Breadmaking %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive distortions at progressively increasing strain amplitudes in the nonlinear region decreased the area enclosed by the loop and resulted in higher ratios of major to minor axis indicating shear thinning behavior (Erturk et al, 2021). Fourier Transform coupled with Chebyshev decomposition method along with Lissajous-Bowditch curves have been utilized to interpret the nonlinear rheological structures of various food systems including wheat dough (Douillard et al, 1991;Yazar et al, 2016a;Duvarci et al, 2017b), native starch in water (Klein et al, 2008), gluten (Ng et al, 2006), carragenan gels (Klein et al, 2007;Klein et al, 2008;Melito et al, 2013b), starches (Klein et al, 2008Li et al, 2009;Alvarez-Ramirez et al, 2019), waxy maize starch paste (Wang et al, 2012), soy protein isolate-flax seed gum dispersions (Bi et al, 2013), dark chocolate (van der Vaart et al, 2013), water-in-oil emulsions (Shu et al, 2013), cheddar, Mozarella, and American cheese (Melito et al, 2013b;2013a), whey protein-agar complexes (Rocha et al, 2014), tuna myofibrillar protein gels (Liu et al, 2014), foams (Ptaszek, 2015;, yeast biofilms (Brugnoni et al, 2014), agar with locust bean gum (Sousa & Gonçalves, 2015), mashed potato (Joyner & Meldrum, 2016), egg white protein foam with added apple pectin and xanthan gum (Ptaszek, 2014), gelatin gels (Goudoulas & Germann, 2019), shortening (B. Macias- Rodriguez & Marangoni, 2016), gluten-free doughs (Yazar et al, 2016a;Yazar et al, 2016c;Yazar et al, 2017), tomato paste (Duvarci et al, 2017b), gum extracted from Alyssum homolocarpum seed , waxy rice starch (Precha-Atsawanan et al, 2018), fish gelatingum arabic mixture in oil…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yazar et al have reported that past studies on dough using FTC method showed strain stiffening caused by gluten networks and shear thinning caused by reduced starch interactions. Increasing strain amplitudes are compared without time information to determine the intercycle nonlinear characteristics of dough (Yazar et al, 2016a). Conversely, SPP methodology provides a history of regenerative deformation within a dough structure during an oscillation cycle (Erturk et al, 2022).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%